This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Boosted HCCI - Controlling Pressure-Rise Rates for Performance Improvements using Partial Fuel Stratification with Conventional Gasoline
Journal Article
2011-01-0897
ISSN: 1946-3936, e-ISSN: 1946-3944
Sector:
Citation:
Dec, J., Yang, Y., and Dronniou, N., "Boosted HCCI - Controlling Pressure-Rise Rates for Performance Improvements using Partial Fuel Stratification with Conventional Gasoline," SAE Int. J. Engines 4(1):1169-1189, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0897.
Language:
English
Abstract:
This study investigates the potential of partial fuel
stratification for reducing the knocking propensity of
intake-boosted HCCI engines operating on conventional gasoline.
Although intake boosting can substantially increase the high-load
capability of HCCI, these engines would be more production-viable
if the knock/stability load limit could be extended to allow higher
loads at a given boost and/or to provide even higher thermal
efficiencies. A technique termed partial fuel stratification (PFS)
has recently been shown to greatly reduce the combustion-induced
pressure-rise rate (PRR), and therefore the knocking propensity of
naturally aspirated HCCI, when the engine is fueled with a
φ-sensitive, two-stage-ignition fuel. The current work explores the
potential of applying PFS to boosted HCCI operation using
conventional gasoline, which does not typically show two-stage
ignition. Experiments were conducted in a single-cylinder HCCI
research engine (0.98 liters) at 1200 rpm. The engine was equipped
with a compression-ratio 14 piston, and combustion phasing was
controlled by EGR addition.
PFS is produced by premixing the majority of the fuel and then
directly injecting the remainder (up to about 20%) in the latter
part of the compression stroke. For PFS to be effective, the
fuel's autoignition chemistry must vary with the local
equivalence ratio (φ) to produce a staged combustion event.
Accordingly, tests were conducted to determine the φ-sensitivity of
gasoline. They show that at naturally aspirated conditions (Pin = 1
bar), gasoline is not φ-sensitive, and PFS is not effective for
reducing the PRR. However, with sufficient intake boost (e.g., Pin
= 2 bar), gasoline is found to become highly φ-sensitive, and PFS
very effectively reduces the PRR. Varying the amount of PFS, by
adjusting either the timing or amount of DI fuel, allows control of
the PRR reduction. Applying PFS to high loads at Pin = 2 bar
substantially shifts the knock/stability limit and increases the
maximum IMEPg from 11.7 (premixed) to 13.0 bar (PFS). Maximum load
improvements with PFS are also seen for other intake pressures
ranging from 1.6 to 2.4 bar. Finally, because it allows more
advanced combustion phasing without knock, PFS is also effective
for increasing the thermal efficiency of boosted HCCI over a range
of loads for each Pin, yielding typical fuel economy improvements
of 2 - 2.5%. Overall, PFS has a strong potential for improving
gasoline-fueled boosted HCCI operation.