This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Starship Life Support
Technical Paper
2009-01-2466
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The design and mass cost of a starship and its life support system are investigated. The mission plan for a multigenerationai interstellar voyage to colonize a new planet is used to describe the starship design, including the crew habitat, accommodations, and life support. Cost is reduced if a small crew travels slowly and lands with minimal equipment. The first human interstellar colonization voyage will probably travel about 10 light years and last hundreds of years. The required travel velocity is achievable by nuclear propulsion using near future technology. To minimize mission mass, the entire starship would not decelerate at the destination. Only small descent vehicles would land on the destination planet. The most mass efficient colonization program would use colonizing crews of only a few dozen. Highly reliable life support can be achieved by providing selected spares and full replacement systems. Two alternate candidate life support approaches are oxygen and water recycling systems with stored dehydrated food or plants grown to provide food, oxygen, and water recycling. The mass costs of such systems using current technology are estimated and compared. Growing food for starship life support requires more mass than providing dehydrated food, even for multigeneration voyages of hundreds of years. The benefits of growing some food may justify the added mass cost. A system growing half the food is competitive with all dehydrated food. Plant growth technology has much more potential for mass reduction than dehydrated food, and currently projected improvements in plant growing technology could make it competitive. The lowest total mission mass is achieved a relatively low interstellar travel velocities. The life support mass saving on shorter voyages is less than the propulsion mass required to increase velocity. Life support is half the total spacecraft mass without propulsion, but propulsion is one and a half times more massive than the spacecraft, so life support is only twenty percent of the spacecraft plus propulsion mass. A single multigenerationai interstellar voyage to colonize a new planet would have cost similar to that of the Apollo program. We can go to the stars!
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Jones, H., "Starship Life Support," SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2466, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-2466.Also In
References
- BVAD Advanced Life Support Baseline Values and Assumptions Document, NASA/CR—2004-208941 August 2004
- Carrasquillo, R. L. Reuter, J. L. Philistine, C. L “Summary of Resources for the International Space Station Environmental Control and Life Support System,” Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Environmental Systems, ICES 972332 1997
- Czysz, Paul A. Bruno Claudio Future Spacecraft Propulsion Systems: Enabling Technologies for Space Exploration (Springer Praxis Books/Astronautical Engineering) 2006
- HSF Larson, W. K. Pranke, L K. Human Spaceflight: Mission Analysis and Design McGraw-Hill New York 2000
- Eckart, P. Spaceflight Life Support and Biospherics Kluwer Academic Dordrecht 1996
- Hanford, A. J. “Advanced Regenerative Life Support System Study,” JSC 38672, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas 1997
- Jones, H. W. “Matching Crew Diet and Crop Food Production in BIO-Plex,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-2397, Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Environmental Systems 2000
- Jones, H. W. “Design Rules for Space Life Support Systems,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2003-01-2357, Proceedings of the 33rd international Conference on Environmental Systems, 2003
- Jones, H. W. “Comparison of Bioregenerative and Physical/Chemical Life Support Systems,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2006-01-2082, Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Environmental Systems, 2006
- Jones, H. W. “Equivalent Mass versus Life Cycle Cost for Life Support Technology Selection,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2003-01-2635, Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Environmental Systems, 2003
- Jones, Harry “Ultra Reliable Space Life Support Systems,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2008-01-2160, Proceedings of the 38th international Conference on Environmental Systems, 2008
- Kraus, J. D. Radio Astronomy Cygnus-Quasar Powell, Ohio 1986
- Maxwell, S. Drysdale, A. “Assessment of Waste Processing Technologies for 3 Missions,” SAE Paper No. 2001-01-2365, 31st International Conference on Environmental Systems 2001
- Man-Systems Integration Standards NASA 1995
- Reed, R. D. Coulter, G. R. “Physiology of Spaceflight,” Larson W. K. Pranke L. K. Human Spaceflight: Mission Analysis and Design, McGraw-Hill New York 2000
- Wei land, P. O. Designing for Human Presence in Space: An introduction to Environmental Control and Life Support Systems NASA Reference Publication 1994
- Wertz, J. R. Larson W. J. Space Mission Analysis and Design third edition Kluwer Dordrecht 1999
- Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
- Yakut, M. M Barker, R. S. Parametric study of manned life support systems, Volume 2 – Parametric relations and scaling law, Final report, McDonnel Douglas CR 3283 Jul. 1967
- Zubrin, R. “Nuclear Salt Water Rockets: High Thrust at 10,000 sec ISP” Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 44 371 376 1991