This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of the performance of real-time PM mass and number instrumentation for vehicle exhaust measurements
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 16, 2007 by Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche in Italy
Annotation ability available
Four dynamic PM measurement instruments (EEPS3090, DMS500, DMM230, AVL483) are studied in terms of their usability for diesel exhaust measurements under transient and steady state conditions. Measurements for various engine and exhaust aftertreatment strategies as well as on a Combustion Aerosol Standard (CAST) were conducted. The utilized sampling concepts comprised pre-DPF, tailpipe and CVS tunnel measurements. All results obtained from the two particle size spectrometers (EEPS3090 and DMS500) were compared to corresponding SMPS and CPC values, while the PM mass measurement instruments (DMM230 and AVL483) were compared to filter data. In addition, PM mass was estimated from the transient particle size spectra of EEPS3090 and DMS500, assuming different particle density functions, and was also compared to the corresponding filter data. All instruments were suitable to resolve fast changes in PM emissions. The linearity and repeatability for each of the instruments was found to be good over a wide range of PM concentrations for both steady state and transient conditions. However, for low mass emissions below 5 mg/km, the relative deviations between the DMM230 and the AVL483 compared to the filter data were significant. The size distributions measured by the two spectral instruments deviated from the corresponding SMPS results especially for particles at the upper and lower end of the measured size range. The concentration of larger particles seems to be underestimated by the EEPS3090 and the DMS500. The comparison between mass emissions calculated from the size spectra of these instruments using typical diesel soot effective densities (fractal dimension 2.3) and the corresponding filter values suggest the EEPS3090 and DMS500 to significantly underestimate the particle volume. This also indicates a miscalculation of the number of larger particles by EEPS3090 and DMS500. For an assumed size independent effective particle density of ρeff (Dp) = 1 g/cm3 a reasonable agreement of PM masses between the spectral instruments and the filter values could be achieved.
CitationBergmann, M., Scheer, V., Vogt, R., and Benter, T., "Comparison of the performance of real-time PM mass and number instrumentation for vehicle exhaust measurements," SAE Technical Paper 2007-24-0116, 2007, https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-24-0116.
- Wichmann H. -E. Spix, C. Tuch T. Wölke G. Peters A. Heinrich J. et al. 2000 “Daily mortality and fine and ultrafine particles in Erfurt, Germany” Report 98 Health Effects Institute
- Frampton M. W. Utell M. J. Wojciech Z. Oberdörster G. Cox C. Li-Shan H. et al. 2004 “Effects of exposure to ultrafine carbon particles in healthy subjects and subjects with asthma” Report 126 Health Effects Institute
- Chase, Richard E. Duszkiewicz, Gary J. Richert, Joel F. O. Lewis, Desmonia Maricq, M. Matti Xu, Ning 2004 “PM measurement artifact: Organic vapor deposition on different filter media” SAE 2004-01-70967
- Vogt, R. Scheer, V. Kirchner U. 2006 “Measurement challenges of particle emissions at Euro-5 level” 4. Int. Exhaust Gas and particulate Emissions Forum Ludwigsburg 3-00-018207-1 67 72
- Mörsch, O. Sorsche P. Investigation of Alternative Methods to Determine Particulate Mass Emissions UNECE/WP.29/GRPE report 2001
- www.cambustion.co.uk/instruments/dms500/index.ht ml
- TSI Incorporated 2006 Model 3090 Engine Exhaust Particle Sizer™ Spectrometer Operation and Service Manual, P/N 1980494 August 2006 www.tsi.com/Product.aspx?Pid=82
- www.avl.com/wo/webobsession.servlet.go/encoded/ YXBwPWJjbXMmcGFnZT12aWV3Jm5vZGVpZD00 MDAwMzkzNTI_3D.html
- Wehner B. Philippin S. Wiedensohler A. 2002 “Design and calibration of a thermodenuder with an improved heating unit to measure the size-dependent volatile fraction of aerosol particles” Aerosol Science 33 2002 1087 1093
- Kasper, M. 2004 “The number concentration of non-volatile particles - Design study for an instrument according to the PMP recommendations” SAE Paper 04FL-33
- Symonds, J. P. R. et al. 2006 “Diesel soot mass calculation in real-time with a differential mobility spectrometer” Aerosol Science 2006 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.10.001
- Gruber M. Lenz H.P. Reischl G.P. Wopelka T. 2001 “Particulate Size Distribution Under Transient Driving Cycle Conditions” 22. Internationales Wiener Motorensymposium 26.-27. April 2001
- Giechaskiel, B. Ntziachristos, L. Samaras, Z. Casati, R. Scheer, V. Vogt, R. 2007 “Effect of Speed and Speed Transition on the Formation of Nucleation Mode Particles from a Light Duty Diesel Vehicle” SAE 2007-01-1110
- Maricq M. Xu N. 2004 “The effective density and fractal dimension of soot particles from premixed flames and motor vehicle exhaust” Aerosol Science 35 2004 1251 1274
- Park K. Cao F. Kittelson D. McMurry P. 2003 “Relationship between Particle Mass and Mobility for Diesel Exhaust Particles” Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003 37 3 577 583
- Kittelson D. Hands T. Nickolaus C. Collings N. Niemelä V. Twigg M. 2004 “Mass correlation of engine emissions with spectral instruments” SAE 20045462