This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Demand Analysis for Decision-Based Design of Vehicle Engine
Technical Paper
2004-01-1535
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Our research is motivated by the need for a rigorous engineering design framework and the need for developing a demand analysis approach that is critical for assessing the profit a product can bring. A Decision-Based Design framework is presented as a rigorous design approach and the method of Discrete Choice Analysis is applied in order to create a demand model that facilitates engineering decision-making in vehicle design with an emphasis on engine design. Through interdisciplinary collaborations, we illustrate how the gap between market research and engineering analysis can be bridged in product design.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Wassenaar, H., Chen, W., Cheng, J., and Sudjianto, A., "Demand Analysis for Decision-Based Design of Vehicle Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1535, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-1535.Also In
References
- Arrow, K.J. “ Social Choice and Individual Values ” John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York 1963
- Arrow, K.J. Raynaud, H. Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-Making Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1986
- Ben-Akiva, M Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts 1985
- Breiman, L. Spector, P. ‘Submodel selection and evaluation in regression: The X-random case” International Statistical Review 60 291 319 1992
- Cook, H. E. Product Management: Value, Quality, Cost, Price, Profit, and Organization Chapman & Hall London 1997
- Daganzo, C. “Multinomial Probit, the theory and its application to demand forecasting” Academic Press Inc. New York 1979
- Donndelinger, J. Cook, H.E. “Methods for Analyzing the Value of Automobiles,” SAE Paper 970762 Warrendale, PA Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Feb. 1997
- Fowlkes, W.Y. Creveling, C.M. Engineering Methods for Robust Product Design Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Reading, MA 1995
- Georgiopoulos, P. Fellini, R. Sasena, M. Papalambros, P.Y. “Optimal Design Decisions in Product Portfolio Valuation” Proceedings of the 2002 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences Montreal, Canada September 29 October 2 2002
- Green, P.E. Srinivasan, V. “Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice” Journal of Marketing 1990
- Green, P.E. Srinivasan, V. “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook” Journal of Consumer Research 5 1978
- Green, P.E. Wind, Y. “New Ways to Measure Consumer Judgments” Harvard Business Review 1975
- Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis second Macmillan Publishing Company New York 1993
- Hair, J.F. Anderson, R.E. Tatham, R.L. Black, W.C. “ Multivariate Data Analysis ” 5th Prentice Hall College Div,. 1998
- Hazelrigg, G.A. “The Implications of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem on Approaches to Optimal Engineering Design” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 118 161 164 1996
- Hazelrigg, G.A. “A Framework for Decision based Engineering Design” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 120 653 658 1998
- Hazelrigg, G.A. “An Axiomatic Framework for Engineering Design” Transactions of the ASME 121 342 347 1999
- Hensher, D.A. Johnson, L.W. “Applied Discrete Choice Modeling” Halsted Press New York 1981
- Krueger, R.A. “Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research” 2nd Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications California 1994
- Li H. Azarm, S. “Product Design Selection under Uncertainty and with Competitive Advantage” ASME Design Technical Conference Baltimore MD 2000
- Louviere, J.J “Why Stated Preference Discrete Choice Modelling is NOT Conjoint Analysis (and what SPDCM IS)” Memetrics white paper 2000
- Louviere, J.J. Hensher, D.A. Swait, J.D. “ Stated Choice Methods, Analysis and Application ” Cambridge University Press 2000
- Luce, R. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis Wiley New York 1959
- Phadke, M.S. 1989 Quality Engineering using Robust Design Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
- Marschak, J. “Binary Choice Constraints on Random Utility Indicators” Stanford Symposium on Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences Arrow K. Stanford University Press Stanford, California 1960
- Otto K.N. Wood, K. Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ 2001
- Raftery, A. “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research” Social Methodology 1995
- Shiba, S. Graham, A. Walden, D. New American TQM: four practical revolutions in management Productivity Press Cambridge, Mass. 1993
- Thurstone, L. “A Law of Comparative Judgment” Psychological Review 34 273 286 1927
- Train, K. “ Qualitative Choice Analysis, theory, econometrics, and an application to automobile demand ” MIT Press Cambridge, MA 1986
- Tversky, A. “Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice” Psychological Review 79 281 299 1972
- Wassenaar, H.J. Chen, W. “An Approach to Decision Based Design” Proceedings of the 2001 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences Pittsburgh, PA September 9-12 2001 ASME Journal of Mechanical Design