This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
EFFECTS OF SEAT BACK FORCE-DEFLECTION PROPERTIES ON INJURIES FOR BOTH FRONT AND REAR SEAT OCCUPANTS IN REAR IMPACTS
Published June 04, 2001 by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in United States
Annotation ability available
The public debate over the most appropriate seat design to best protect occupants at all rear impact speeds is more than an decade old. There have been numerous publications in the technical literature discussing the relative merits of lower versus higher seat back strength. Proponents of lower seat back strength assert that the larger rearward deformation of seat backs allowed by most current seats is less injurious to the seats’ occupants than seats with higher seat back strength. However, proponents of higher seat back strength assert that stiffer seat backs provide greater overall safety benefits to occupants of the seats and also protect passengers that may be seated behind them.
The current study used a modified version of a validated MADYMO computer model of a 1986–1994 GM Grand Am production seat, originally developed by the University of Virginia (UVA), to determine the effect of seat back strength on occupant injury in rear impacts. Both a single seat and tandem seat arrangement were modeled at a crash change of velocity (ΔV) approximately seventeen and thirty kilometers-per-hour. Seat occupants were 5 th percentile female, 50th and 95th percentile male Hybrid III dummies. The maximum injury measure for each dummy, normalized by performance limits, were used to assess the results.
The single seat results for 30 kph ΔV rear impacts indicate that the least severe injury occurs at a seat strength three to five times the baseline seat for all dummy sizes, except the 95th percentile male. For the 95th percentile male a slightly lower injury value was obtained for a non-deforming or rigid seat. The 17 kph ΔV rear impacts results varied with occupant size and head restraint position. In the dual seat simulations with a baseline front seat, highly injurious contact occurred between the 95th percentile male front seat dummy and 5th percentile female rear seat dummy. Increasing the front seat strength by three times prevented this contact. For a single out-of-position 50th percentile male dummy, the injury measures for the baseline seat were similar to those for a seat with three times the baseline strength.
CitationSaunders, J., Molino, L., and Sun, E., "EFFECTS OF SEAT BACK FORCE-DEFLECTION PROPERTIES ON INJURIES FOR BOTH FRONT AND REAR SEAT OCCUPANTS IN REAR IMPACTS," SAE Technical Paper 2001-06-0079, 2001.
- Sieveka, E Kitis, L Pilkey, W 1996
- Prasad, P Kim, A Weerappuli, D.P.V. Roberts, v. Schneider D 1997 Relationships Between Passenger Car Seat Back Strength and Occupant Injury Severity in Rear End Collisions: Field and Laboratory Studies SAE 973343 , Proceedings of the 41 st Stapp Car Crash Conference
- Nilson, G Svensson, M.Y Lovsund, P Viano, D.C. 1994 th
- Molino, L 1998
- Jakobsson, L Lundell, B Alfredsson, B 1998 Protecting Against Whiplash in Rear-End Collisions
- NHTSA 2001
- McCullough, C Hollowell, W. Battisti, P 950360
- Prasad, P Kim, A Weerappuli, D.P.V. Biofidelity of Anthropomorphic Test Devices for Rear Impact SAE 973342 , Proceedings of the 41 st Stapp Car Crash Conference
- Nightingale, R.W Winkelsten, B.A. Van Ee, C.A. Myers, B.S. Injury Mechanisms in the Pediatric Cervical Spine During Out-of-Position Airbag Deployments 42 nd Annual Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine 1998
- Van Ee, C.A. Nightingale, R.W. Camacho, D.L Chancey, V.C. Knaub, K.E. Sun, E.A. Myers, B.A. Tensile Properties of the Human Muscular and Ligamentous Cervical Spine Stapp Car Crash Journal November 2000