Alcohol-to-jet (ATJ) upcycling of ethanol to sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is
an attractive emerging pathway for SAF production, especially in the US Midwest
with large-scale corn ethanol production. Only 39% of the corn carbon is
converted to ethanol, 20% is emitted as CO2. Capturing the
CO2 to produce additional ethanol or SAF directly can increase
the carbon yield. To guide technology selection, this work used life cycle
assessment for several CO2-to-SAF production pathways. Additionally,
improvements for corn ethanol production were explored by replacing natural gas
burners with heat pumps for corn drying, which reduced the carbon intensity of
corn ethanol by nearly 16%. But subsequent upgrading of the ethanol to SAF is
only 4.5–20% better than conventional aviation fuel. By contrast,
CO2-based alternative routes to SAF fared better, reducing carbon
intensities between 83% and 90%. Gas fermentation of CO2 to ethanol
with subsequent ATJ upcycling to SAF was contrasted to Fischer–Tropsch
conversion of CO2 to SAF. Both streams require CO2
conversion to CO, which can be produced using reverse water–gas shift or solid
oxide electrolyzer cells. The Fischer–Tropsch synthesis shows a higher reduction
in carbon intensity (up to 90%) compared to ATJ (up to 84.4%). For other impact
categories, such as ozone depletion, ecotoxicity, and the like, the differences
are of similar magnitude. Capturing CO2 locally at the bioethanol
factory and converting that CO2 to ethanol might overall be
preferable with a fermentation process that is quite like bioethanol production
compared to Fischer–Tropsch synthesis for which products require a new
transportation infrastructure. The aviation fuel yield from ATJ can reach 90%,
higher than the 50–70% yield from Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, with gasoline and
diesel fuel as major by-products for which markets will shrink in the future.
Overall, ATJ appears to be the best choice for CO2-to-SAF using the
synergy with corn ethanol factories for quick launch.