This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Relating Experimental Drive Distraction and Driving Performance Metrics to Crash Involvement - Definitions of Terms and Concepts
- Ground Vehicle Standard
Published October 18, 2018 by SAE International in United States
Downloadable datasets availableAnnotation ability available
This Information Report provides functional definitions and discussions of key terms and concepts for relating the experimental evaluation of driver distraction to real-world crash involvement. Examples of driver distraction and driving performance metrics include those related to vehicle control, object and event detection and response (OEDR), physiological indicators, subjective assessments, or combinations thereof. Examples of real-world crash involvement metrics include the epidemiological effect size measures of risk ratio, rate ratio, and odds ratio. The terms and concepts defined in this document are not intended to contribute to methodologies for assessing the individual metrics within a domain; these are covered in other SAE documents (e.g., SAE J2944) and SAE technical reports. For any measure chosen in one domain or the other, the goal is to give general definitions of key terms and concepts that relate metrics in one domain to those in the other. Issues of repeatability and validity are discussed in relation to these methods and metrics for relating the two domains. However, the actual specification of a particular methodology for predicting crash involvement from experimental studies is outside the scope of the present document.
This informational report applies to all motorized on-road road vehicles including passenger cars, trucks, buses, and powered two-wheelers. Driver distraction may be related to any activity that competes with the driving task and diverts attention away from activities critical for safe driving.
Note that the terms and concepts described herein may also be general enough to suggest methods to estimate crash involvement of real-world automated vehicles from simulation metrics. The intended users of the document are practitioners and researchers in the industry, academia, and other organizations with interest in driver distraction and driving performance assessment and road safety.
Driver distraction is one of the key factors underlying road crashes (refer to Ascone et al. 2009; NHTSA 2009, 2017) and thus is a major focus for policymaking and human-vehicle interface design. There are many existing metrics and procedures for the experimental evaluation of driver distraction, several of which have been specified in international standards and/or regional guidelines (e.g., ISO 15007-1, ISO/TS 15007-2, ISO 16673, ISO 26022, ISO 17488, and SAE J2944). However, it cannot be simply assumed that the effects of distraction on driving performance or driver behavior/state measured with these procedures are directly indicative of real-world crash involvement. Thus, there is a need for approaches that can be used to systematically relate experimentally measured effects of driver distraction on driving performance and driver behavior/state to real-world crash involvement. This document provides a set of concepts and definitions of terms that can be used to characterize this relation.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
|Unnamed Dataset 2|
|Unnamed Dataset 3|
|Unnamed Dataset 4|
|Unnamed Dataset 5|
|Unnamed Dataset 6|
|Unnamed Dataset 7|
|Unnamed Dataset 8|
Driver Metrics, Performance, Behaviors and States Committee
This technical committee is responsible for all safety and human factors issues that impact the driver metrics (e.g., navigation and route guidance and calculations, driver visual behavior using video-based techniques, operational definitions of driving performance measures, evaluation approaches and metrics, and driver fatigue and drowsiness states, etc.).
* Redlines comparisons are available for those standards listed in the Revision History that contain a radio button. A redline comparison of the current version against a revision is accomplished by selecting the radio button next to the standard and then selecting 'compare'. At this time, Redline versions only exist for some AMS standards. SAE will continue to add redline versioning with ongoing updates to SAE MOBILUS.