This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Numerical Prediction of Knock in a Bi-Fuel Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 19, 1998 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Dedicated natural gas engines suffer the disadvantages of limited vehicle range and relatively few refueling stations. A vehicle capable of operating on either gasoline or natural gas allows alternative fuel usage without sacrificing vehicle range and mobility. However, the bi-fuel engine must be made to provide equal performance on both fuels. Although bi-fuel conversions have existed for a number of years, historically natural gas performance is degraded relative to gasoline due to reduced volumetric efficiency and lower power density of CNG. Much of the performance losses associated with CNG can be overcome by increasing the compression ratio. However, in a bi-fuel application, high compression ratios can result in severe engine knock during gasoline operation. Variable intake valve timing, increased exhaust gas recirculation and retarded ignition timing were explored as a means of controlling knock during gasoline operation of a bi-fuel engine.
To avoid the prohibitive cost of grinding and testing multiple intake cams, a numerical model was developed to predict the occurrence and intensity of knock given various intake valve timing profiles, and geometric compression ratios. The autoignition model employed a zero-dimensional, steady-state thermodynamic cycle simulation to calculate the pressure and temperature of the end-gas region. Heat release due to combustion was modeled according to empirical mass burn relations derived from an extensive database of in-cylinder pressure measurements recorded from dynamometer testing of a Saturn 1.9 liter spark ignition engine. The onset of autoignition was predicted according to and empirical Arrhenius ignition delay correlation calibrated using experimental data taken during knocking and non-knocking operation of the Saturn engine. The model was used in conjunction with experimental testing with selected intake valve timings and compression ratios to determine a combination, which would produce minimum drivability difference between CNG and gasoline. Results of this parametric study showed that a compression ratio of 11.5:1 with an intake duration of 274° for gasoline operation and an intake duration of 244° degrees for CNG operation resulted in balanced wide-open throttle performance between the two fuels without the risk of knock during gasoline operation.
CitationWayne, W., Clark, N., and Atkinson, C., "Numerical Prediction of Knock in a Bi-Fuel Engine," SAE Technical Paper 982533, 1998, https://doi.org/10.4271/982533.
- Tennant, C.J. Atkinson, R.J. Traver, M.L. Atkinson, C.M. Clark, N.N. “Turbocharging a Bi-Fuel Engine for Performance Equivalent to Gasoline,” SAE Paper 942003
- Weaver, C.S. “Natural Gas Vehicles - A Review of the State of The Art,” SAE Paper 892133
- Jaaskelainen, H.E. Wallace, J.S. “Performance and Emissions of a Natural Gas-Fueled 16 Valve DOHC Four-Cylinder Engine,” SAE Paper 930380
- Tennant, C.J. deJong, R.D. Atkinson, R.J. Traver, M.L. Atkinson, C. M. Vincent, C.J. Clark, N. N. Lyons, D. W. “Performance of a High Speed Engine with Dual Fuel Capability,” SAE Paper 940517
- Tennant, C.J Atkinson, R.J Traver, M.L. Atkinson, C.M. Clark. N.N. “A Bi-Fuel Engine for the Transition to CNG Usage,” Proceedings ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division, Fall Technical Conference 25 3 61 Milwaukee WI 1995
- Heywood, J.B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals McGraw-Hill Inc. New York NY 1988
- Douaud, A.M. Eyzat, P. “Four-Octane-Number Method for Predicting the Anti-Knock Behavior of Fuels and Engines,” SAE Paper 780080
- Karim, G. A. GAO, J. ”A Predictive Model for knock in Dual Fuel Engines,” SAE Paper No. 921550
- Karim, G A. Liu, Z. I “A Predictive Model for Knock in Spark Ignition Engines,” SAE Paper NO. 922366
- Cowart, J.S. Haghgooie, M. Newman, C.E. Davis, G.C. Pitz, W.J. Westbrook, C. K. “The Intensity of Knock in an Internal Combustion Engine: An Experimental and Modeling Study,” SAE Paper 922327
- Lund, C.M. “HCT - A General Program for Calculating Time-Dependent Phenomena Involving One-Dimensional Hydrodynamics, Transport and Detailed Chemical Kinetics,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory report UCL-52504 Livermore CA 1978
- Ferguson, C.R. Internal Combustion Engines - Applied Thermosciences John Wiley & Sons New York NY 1986
- Olikara, C. Boreman, G. L. “A Computer Program for Calculating Properties of Equilibrium Combustion Products with Some Application to I.C. Engines,” SAE Paper NO. 750486
- Checkel, M.D. Dale, J.D. “Computerized Knock Detection for Engine Pressure Records SAE Paper 860028
- Puzinauskas, P.V. “Examination of Methods Used to Characterize Engine Knock,” SAE Paper 92808
- Checkel, M.D. Dale, J. D. “Testing a Third Derivative Knock Indicator on a Production Engine,” SAE Paper 861216
- Tennant, C. J. Atkinson, R. J. Traver, M. L. Atkinson, C. M. Clark, N. N. “The Design of a Bi-Fuel Engine Which Avoids the Penalties Associated with Natural Gas Operation,” SAE Paper NO. 950679
- Atkinson, R.J. Tennant, C.J. Traver, M.L. Atkinson, C. M. Clark, N.N. “A Controller for a Spark Ignition Engine with Bi-Fuel Capability,” SAE Paper 942004
- Wayne, W. S. Clark, N. N Atkinson, C. M. “A Parametric Study of Knock Control Strategies for a Bi-Fuel Engine,” SAE Paper No. 980895
- Woschni, G. ‘Universally Applicable Equation for Instantaneous Heat Transfer Coefficient in the Internal Combustion Engine,” SAE Paper 670931
- Annand, W.J. “Heat Transfer in the Cylinders of Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engr. 77 36 973 990 1963
- Wolfer, H. H. “Ignition Lag in Diesel Engines,” VDI-For-shungsheft 392 September 1938 15 24 Royal Aircraft Establishment Library Translation 358 August 1950