This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Plastic and Steel Vehicle Fuel Tanks
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published November 30, 1998 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Federal standards that mandate improved fuel economy have resulted in the increased use of lightweight materials in automotive applications. However, the environmental burdens associated with a product extend well beyond the use phase. Life cycle assessment is the science of determining the environmental burdens associated with the entire life cycle of a given product from cradle-to-grave. This report documents the environmental burdens associated with every phase of the life cycle of two fuel tanks utilized in full-sized 1996 GM vans. These vans are manufactured in two configurations, one which utilizes a steel fuel tank, and the other a multi-layered plastic fuel tank consisting primarily of high density polyethylene (HDPE). This study was a collaborative effort between GM and the University of Michigan's National Pollution Prevention Center, which received funding from EPA's National Risk Management Research Laboratory. Findings from this study include:
- Material production phase solid waste production for steel greatly exceeds that for HDPE, however, material production phase energy consumption is much higher for HDPE than steel.
- The use phase dominates the consumption of energy, the gas phase emissions of CO, CO2, NOx, and HC, and the generation of liquid phase dissolved solids. In each of these categories, the HDPE system is environmentally advantageous over the steel system.
The manufacturing phase contributes the largest fractions of airborne particulate matter, liquid phase suspended solids, waterborne oil and grease, and waterborne metals. In each of these, except waterborne metals, the HDPE system is environmentally advantageous over the steel system.
- The end-of-life phase dominates the generation of solid waste. In this category, the steel system is environmentally advantageous over HDPE. This conclusion assumes there is no recycling of the HDPE system.
CitationStephens, R., Williams, R., Keoleian, G., Spatari, S. et al., "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Plastic and Steel Vehicle Fuel Tanks," SAE Technical Paper 982224, 1998, https://doi.org/10.4271/982224.
- American Plastics Council. Economics of Recovery and Recycling 1994.
- Barlow, A., Contos D., Holdren M., Garrison P., Harris L., and Janke B.. Development of Emission Factors for Polyethylene Processing. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 46 (June 1996): 569-580 (1996).
- Boustead, Ian. Eco-Profiles of the European Plastics Industry - Polyethylene and Polypropylene: Report 3. The European Centre for Plastics in the Environment, Brussels, 1 1993.
- Eco-Profiles of the European Plastics Industry, Report 6: Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC). The European Centre for Plastics in the Environment, Brussels, 1994.
- CFR. 40 CFR Part 81 Section 86.094-8, 1994.
- Ellis, Thomas S., Laverty John L. and Lesinski Michele M.. Recyclability and Characterization of Co-Extruded Multilayer Fuel Tanks, SAE980096, 1998.
- (FOEFL) Swiss Federal Office of Environment, Forests, and Landscape, Ecobalance of Packaging Materials State of 1990. Bernes, Switzerland, 1991.
- Franklin Associates. Appendix A: Energy Requirements and Environmental Emissions for Fuel Consumption. Franklin Associates, Prairie Village, KS, 1992.
- Fussler, C.R., Krummenacher B.. Ecobalances: A Key to Better Environmental Material Choices in Automotive Design. Materials and Design 12 (3): 123-128 (1991)
- General MotorsCorporate Data 1996.
- International Iron and Steel Institute, Competition Between Steel and Aluminum for the Passenger Car Brussels, 1994.
- Kar, K., and Keoleian G. A.. Application of life cycle design to aluminum intake manifolds. SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, MI, 26 February. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 1996.
- Keoleian, G.A., Kar K., Manion M.M., and Bulkley J.W.. Industrial Ecology of the Automobile: A Life Cycle Perspective, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE): Warrendale, PA, 1997b, 148 pages.
- Keoleian, Gregory A., and Menerey Dan. Life Cycle Design Guidance Manual: Environmental Requirements and the Product System. US EPA, Office of Research and Development, Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, 1993.
- Keoleian, Gregory A., Spatari Sabrina, and Beal Robb T.. Life Cycle Design of Fuel Tank Systems. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, 1997a.
- Keoleian, Gregory A, Spatari Sabrina, Beal Robb T., Stephens Robert D., and Williams Ronald L.. Application of Life Cycle Inventory Analysis to Fuel Tank System Design. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3 (1), 1998.
- McDaniel, Jeff, Application of Life Cycle Assessment and Design Tools to Instrument Panels: Analysis for Common Sense Initiative Pilot Project. Masters Thesis. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan, 1996.
- Office for the Study of Automotive Transportation, Delphi VIII: Forecast and Analysis of the North American Automotive Industry: Volume 3 Materials. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI UMTRI-96-01-03, 1996.
- Official Journal of the European Communities, “Proposal for a Council Directive on End of Life Vehicles”, 97/C337/02, 9 July 1998.
- Ross, Marc, Goodwin Rob, Watkins Rick, Wang Michael Q., and Wenzel Tom. Real-World Emissions from Model Year 1993, 2000 and 2010 Passenger Cars. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington DC, 1995.
- SETAC Workshop Report - A Technical Framework for Life Cycle Assessment, Smugglers Notch, VT, 18 August 1990. Washington, DC: Society of Environmental Toxicologists and Chemists, 1991.
- Sullivan, J. L., and Hu J.. Life cycle energy analysis for automobiles. SAE Total Life Cycle Conference, Vienna, 16 October. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE Paper 951829, 1995.
- Vigon, B. W., Tolle D. A., Cornary B. W., Latham H. C., Harrison C. L., Bouguski T. L., Hunt R. G., and Sellers J. D.. Life Cycle Assessment: Inventory Guidelines and Principles. US Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH EPA/600/R-92/245, 1993.
- Wood, Richard. Automotive Engineering Plastics. London: Pentech, 1991.
- Wythe, Steve. Stevens Institute of Technology, personal communication, 1996.
- Yamato, Masako, Mituhara Yoshihito. Life Cycle Inventory Study of Automotive Fuel Tank. Life Cycle Inventory Study of Automotive Fuel Tank, Proceedings of the 1997 Total Life Cycle Conference - Life Cycle Management and Assessment (Part 1). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE Paper 971177, 1997.