This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Reduction of Cycle Times for Aircraft Sealing Processes - Laboratory Testing and Concept Validation
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published June 02, 1998 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Engineering validation was necessary for manufacturing concepts intended to facilitate streamlining of aircraft sealing processes.
The objective of this study was to determine if production cycle times can be shortened for aircraft sealing processes. One of the process timesaving concepts considered in this testing was to omit adhesion promoting or to convert this surface preparation requirement into an option.
A variety of sealant bond surfaces (or substrates) were used in this study to test this concept for operations pertaining to fuel tank structure sealing and general (or environmental and pressure) sealing.
Engineering test results presented in this report are the basis of conclusions and recommendations that indicate whether or not specific process timesaving concepts are valid.
The most significant Engineering conclusion was that application of adhesion promoter should continue as an Engineering requirement during surface preparation for sealing of aircraft fuel tank and body (environmental and pressure) structures. Engineering validated two other process streamlining concepts - single brushcoating (SBC) of fasteners, instead of double brushcoating (DBC), and fillet sealing with Class B sealant (no precoating with Class A material).
|Aerospace Standard||Detailed Specification for Aircraft Pressure Refueling Nozzle|
|Aerospace Standard||Sealing of Integral Fuel Tanks|
CitationBauccio, M., "Reduction of Cycle Times for Aircraft Sealing Processes - Laboratory Testing and Concept Validation," SAE Technical Paper 981877, 1998, https://doi.org/10.4271/981877.
- Corporate Engineering Process Specification Sealing of Integral Fuel Tanks Manufactured with Titanium, Composites, and Other Engineering Materials The Boeing Company Seattle, WA
- Corporate Engineering Process Specification Sealing, General The Boeing Company Seattle, WA
- SAE International Aerospace Material Specification AMS 2629B Fluid, Jet Reference February 1994
- Corporate Engineering Material Specification Cleaning Solvent, Presealing The Boeing Company Seattle, WA
- Military Specification: Cleaning Compound, Solvent Mixtures U. S. Air Force 27 April 1993
- Evaluation Report: Adhesion of Fuel Tank Sealants to Dry Film Lubricants Kal-Gard Coating and Manufacturing Corporation AFWAL, Materials Laboratory Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Ohio 21 February 1985
- Military Specification: Sealing Compound, Temperature-Resistant Integral Fuel Tanks and Fuel Cell Cavities, High Adhesion U. S. Air Force 20 January 1995
- Corporate Engineering Material Specification Integral Fuel Tank Sealant The Boeing Company Seattle, WA
- Corporate Specification Support Standard Peel Test, Sealant The Boeing Company Seattle, WA
- Corporate Specification Support Standard Lap Shear, Sealants The Boeing Company Seattle, WA
- Corporate Engineering Process Specification Solvent Cleaning The Boeing Company Seattle, WA
- Corporate Engineering Process Specification Abrasive Cleaning, Deburring and Finishing The Boeing Company Seattle, WA
- Military Standard; Fastener Test Methods, Method 19, Fastener Sealing U.S. Navy 12 December 1990
- SAE International Aerospace Material Specification AMS 3281A Sealing compound, polysulfide (T) synthetic rubber, for integral fuel tank and fuel cell cavities, low density (1.20 to 1.35 sp. gr.), for intermittent use to 360 °F (182 °C) November 1994
- Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for PR-1432GP polysulfide rubber solution - base compound Courtaulds Aerospace, Inc. Glendale, CA 7 February 1996
- Telephone conversation between Seroje Hartoonianan Hawrylo Bob Bauccio Michael 26 January 1998 Subject: VOC Content of Sprayable Corrosion-Inhibiting Polysulfide Sealant
- Mahoney J. W. et. al. Aircraft Integral Fuel Tank Design Handbook 3-9 3-19 Rockwell International Corporation North American Aircraft Operations Los Angeles, CA December 1987
- Salt (Fog) Testing American Society for Testing and Materials West Conshohocken, PA
- Corporate Engineering Process Specification Criteria for Limited Contamination Areas The Boeing Company Seattle, WA
- Isomura Terry Bauccio Michael 17 October 1997 Subject: Internal Aircraft Wing Pressures