This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Field Study of Distance Perception with Large-Radius Convex Rearview Mirrors
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 23, 1998 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
One of the primary reasons that FMVSS 111 currently requires flat rearview mirrors as original equipment on the driver's side of passenger cars is a concern that convex mirrors might reduce safety by causing drivers to overestimate the distances to following vehicles. Several previous studies of the effects of convex rearview mirrors have indicated that they do cause overestimations of distance, but of much lower magnitude than would be expected based on the mirrors' levels of image minification and the resulting visual angles experienced by drivers. Previous studies have investigated mirrors with radiuses of curvature up to 2000 mm. The present empirical study was designed to investigate the effects of mirrors with larger radiuses (up to 8900 mm). Such results are of interest because of the possible use of large radiuses in some aspheric mirror designs, and because of the information they provide about the basic mechanisms by which convex mirrors affect distance perception.
Subjects' distance perceptions for objects seen in large-radius rearview mirrors were measured by magnitude estimation in a static field setting. The results indicate that overestimation of distance continues to decrease as mirror radius increases beyond 2000 mm, and that the overestimation continues to be substantially lower than would be predicted from a model based on image minification and reduction of visual angle. However, even at the longest radius examined in this experiment (8900 mm) the overestimation of distance (8%) is not small enough to be dismissed definitively as trivial. Because various learning effects and changes in driver strategy may compensate for the distortion of distance perception, this does not necessarily mean that convex mirrors of any radius are unsafe. But it suggests that, even for convex mirrors with very long radiuses, the gain in quantity of field of view provided by the convexity comes with a nontrivial cost in quality of field of view, and that the tradeoff between these two characteristics must still be considered in designing optimal mirrors.
|Technical Paper||Distance Perception in Camera-Based Rear Vision Systems|
|Technical Paper||Current Status and Future Prospects for Nonplanar Rearview Mirrors|
|Technical Paper||Effects of Large-Radius Convex Rearview Mirrors on Driver Perception|
CitationFlannagan, M., Sivak, M., Kojima, S., and Traube, E., "A Field Study of Distance Perception with Large-Radius Convex Rearview Mirrors," SAE Technical Paper 980916, 1998, https://doi.org/10.4271/980916.
Human Factors in Driving, Vehicle Seating, and Rear Vision
Number: SP-1358 ; Published: 1998-02-13
Number: SP-1358 ; Published: 1998-02-13
- Bowles, T. S. (1969). Motorway overtaking with four types of exterior rear view mirror. In International Symposium on Man-Machine Systems, Volume 2, Transport systems and vehicle control (IEEE Conference Record no. 69C58-MMS) Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
- ECE (Economic Commission for Europe). (1988). Uniform provisions concerning the approval of rear-view mirrors, and of motor vehicles with regard to the installation of rear-view mirrors (ECE Regulation No. 46). Geneva: United Nations.
- Fisher, J. A., & Galer, I. A. R. (1984). The effects of decreasing the radius of curvature of convex external rear view mirrors upon drivers' judgements of vehicles approaching in the rearward visual field. Ergonomics, 27, 1209-1224.
- Flannagan, M. J., Sivak, M., & Traube, E. C. (1996). Driver perceptual adaptation to nonplanar rearview mirrors. In Serafin C. & Zobel G. (Eds.), Automotive design advancements in human factors: Improving drivers' comfort and performance, SP-1155 (pp. 213-220). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
- Flannagan, M. J., Sivak, M., & Traube, E. C. (1997). Effects of large-radius convex rearview mirrors on driver perception. In Jiao J. & Neumann R. (Eds.), New concepts in international automotive lighting technology, SP-1249 (pp. 175-181). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
- Luoma, J., Sivak, M., & Flannagan, M. J. (1995). Effects of driver-side mirror type on lane-change accidents. Ergonomics, 38, 1973-1978.
- Marks, L. E. (1974). Sensory processes: The new psychophysics. New York: Academic Press.
- Mortimer, R. G. (1971). The effects of convex exterior mirrors on lane-changing and passing performance of drivers (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 710543). New York: Society of Automotive Engineers.
- Pilhall, S. (1981). Improved rearward view (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 810759). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
- Preamble to an amendment to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 111, 47 Fed. Reg. 38698 (1982) (codified at 49 C.F.R. § 571.111).
- Schumann, J., Sivak, M., & Flannagan, M. J. (1998). Are driver-side convex mirrors helpful or harmful? International journal of Vehicle Design, 19, 29-40.
- Sivak, M., Soler, J., & Tränkle, U. (1989). Cross-cultural differences in driver risk-taking. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 21, 363-369.
- Smith, R. L., Bardales, M. C., & Burger, W. J. (1978). Perceived importance of zones surrounding a vehicle and learning to use a convex mirror effectively (DOT HS 803 713). Washington, D.C.: Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
- Sugiura, S., & Kimura, K. (1978). Outside rearview mirror requirements for passenger cars: Curvature, size, and location (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 780339). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
- Walraven, P. L., & Michon, J. A. (1969). The influence of some side mirror parameters on the decisions of drivers (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 690270). New York: Society of Automotive Engineers.