This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Dynamic Responses of the Cervical Spine: Buckling, End Conditions, and Tolerance in Compressive Impacts
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published November 12, 1997 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This study explores the dynamics of head and cervical spine impact with the specific goals of determining the effects of head inertia and impact surface on injury risk. Head impact experiments were performed using unembalmed head and neck specimens from 22 cadavers. These included impacts onto compliant and a rigid surfaces with the surface oriented to produce both flexion and extension attitudes. Tests were conducted using a drop track system to produce impact velocities on the order of 3.2 m/s. Multiaxis transduction recorded the head impact forces, head accelerations, and the reactions at T1. The tests were also imaged at 1000 frames/sec.
Injuries occurred 2 to 30 msec following head impact and prior to significant head motion. Head motions were not found to correlate with injury classification. Decoupling was observed between the head and T1, resulting in a lag in the force histories. Cervical spine loading due to head rebound constituted up to 54±16 percent of the total axial neck load for padded impacts and up to 38±30 percent for the rigid impacts. Dynamic buckling was also observed; including first order modes and transient higher order modes which shifted the structure from a primarily compressive mode of deformation to various bending modes. The average load at failure was 2243±572 N for males and 1061 ± 273 N for females. The difference between male and female tolerance was significant p = 0.0015). Impacts onto the padded surfaces produced significantly larger neck impulses (p = 0.00023) and a significantly greater frequency of cervical spine injuries than rigid impacts (p = 0.043). The impact angle was also correlated with injury risk (p < 0.00001).
These experiments demonstrate that in the absence of head pocketing, the head mass can provide sufficient constraint to cause cervical spine injury. The buckling modes illustrate the kinematic complexity of cervical spine dynamics and may explain why injuries can occur at different vertebral levels and with widely varying mechanism in compressive head impacts. These experiments also suggest that highly deformable padded contact surfaces should be employed carefully in environments where there is the risk for cervical spine injury; however, the orientation of the head, neck, and torso relative to the impact surface is of greater significance.
|Technical Paper||Head and Neck Response to Axial Impacts|
|Technical Paper||Dynamic Characteristics of the Human Cervical Spine|
|Technical Paper||The Influence of End Condition on Human Cervical Spine Injury Mechanisms|
CitationNightingale, R., McElhaney, J., Camacho, D., Kleinberger, M. et al., "The Dynamic Responses of the Cervical Spine: Buckling, End Conditions, and Tolerance in Compressive Impacts," SAE Technical Paper 973344, 1997, https://doi.org/10.4271/973344.
- McElhaney J. H. and Myers B. S.. Biomechanical aspects of cervical trauma. In Naham A. M. and Melvin J. W., editors, Accidental Injury, pages 311-361. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993.
- Miller T. R., Douglass J. B., Galbraith M. S., Lestina D. C., and Pindus N. M.. Costs of head and neck injury and a benefit-cost analysis of bicycle helmets. In Levine R. S., editor. Head and Neck Injury, pages 211-240. Society of Automotive Engineering, New York, 1994.
- Huelke D. F., Moffat E.A., Mendelsohn R.A., and Melvin J.W.. Cervical fractures and fracture dislocations - an overview. Proceedings of the 23rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, (790131):462-468, 1979.
- Burke D. C., Burley H. T., and Ungar G. H.. Data on spinal injuries-part ii, outcome of the treatment of 352 consecutive admissions. Aust N Z J Surg, 55(4):377-82, Aug 1985.
- Hadley M. N., Sonntag V. K., Grahm T. W., Masferrer R., and Browner C.. Axis fractures resulting from motor vehicle accidents, the need for occupant restraints. Spine, 11(9):861-4, Nov 1986.
- Levine A. M. and Edwards C. C.. Fractures of the atlas. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 73(5):680-691, 1991.
- Shapiro S. A.. Management of unilateral locked facet of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery, 33(5):832-7; discussion 837, Nov 1993.
- Alker G. J., Oh Y. S., Leslie E. V., Lehtotay J., Panaro V. A., and Eschnev E.G. E. G.. Post-mortem radiology of head and neck injuries in fatal traffic accidents. Radiology, 114:611-617, 1975.
- Bucholz R. W., Burkhead W. Z., Graham W., and Petty C.. Occult cervical spine injuries in fatal traffic accidents. Journal of Trauma, 19(10):768-771, 1979.
- Yoganandan N., Haffner M., Maiman D. J., Nichols H., Pintar Frank A., Jentzen J., Weinshel S. S., Larson S. J., and Sances Anthony. Epidemiology and injury biomechanics of motor vehicle related trauma to the human spine. Proc. 33rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, 1989.
- Myers B. S. and Winkelstein B. A.. Epidemiology, classification, mechanism, and tolerance of human cervical spine injuries. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 23(5&6):307-409, 1995.
- Bauze R.J. and Ardran G. M.. Experimental production of forward dislocation of the human cervical spine. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 60-B:239-245, 1978.
- Hodgson V. R. and Thomas L. M.. Mechanisms of cervical spine injury during impact to the protected head. Proceedings of the 24th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pages 17-42, 1980.
- Nusholtz G. S., Huelke D.E., Lux P., Alem N. M., and Montalvo F.. Cervical spine injury mechanisms. Proc. 27th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pages 179-197, 1983.
- Alem N. M., Nusholtz G. S., and Melvin J. W.. Head and neck response to axial impacts. Proceedings of the 28th Stapp Car Crash Conference. (841667):275-288, 1984.
- Yoganandan N., Sances A. Jr., Maiman D. J., Myklebust J. B, Pech P., and Larson S. J.. Experimental spinal injuries with vertical impact. Spine, 11(9):855-860, 1986.
- Myers B. S., McElhaney J. H., Richardson W. J.. Nightingale R. W., and Doherty B. J.. The influence of end condition on human cevical spine injury mechanisms. Proc. 35th Stapp Car Crash Conference, (912915):391-399, 1991.
- Nightingale R. W., McElhaney J. H., Richardson W. J., Best T. M., and Myers B. S.. Experimental cervical spine injury: relating head motion, injury classification, and injury mechanism. Journal of Bone Joint Surgery, 78-A(3):412-421, 1996.
- Alem N.M., Nusholtz G.S., and Melvin J.W.. Superior-inferior head impact tolerance levels. Technical Report UMTRI-82-42, UMTRI, 1982.
- Cavanaugh J. M. and King A. I.. Control of transmission of HIV and other bloodborne pathogens in biomechanical cadaveric testing. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 8:159-166, 1990.
- Matsushita T., Sato T. B., Hirabayashi K., Fujimura S., Asazuma T., and Takatori T.. X-ray study of the human neck motion due to head inertia loading. Proceedings of the '38th Stapp Car Crash Conference, (942208):55-64, 1994.
- McElhaney J. H., Paver J. G., MeCrackin H. J., and Maxwell G. M.. Cervical spine compression responses. Proc. 27th Stapp Car Crash Conference, (831615):163-177, 1983.
- McElhaney J. H., States John D. Snyder R. G., and Gabrielsen M. A.. Biomechanical analysis of swimming pool injuries. Society of Automotive Engineers, 790137:47-53, 1979.
- Panjabi M. M., White 3d A. A., and Johnson R. M.. Cervical spine mechanics as a function of transection of components. J Biomech, 8(5):327-36, 1975.
- White A. A. III and Panjabi M. M.. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. JB Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, 1990.
- Nightingale R. W., McElhaney J. H., Richardson W. J., and Myers B. S.. Dynamic responses of the head and cervical spine to axial impact loading. Journal of Biomechanics, 29(3):307-318, 1996.
- Nusholtz G. S., Melvin J. W., Huelke D. F., Alem N. M., and Blank J. G.. Response of the cervical spine to superior-inferior head impact. Proc. 25th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pages 197-237, 1981.
- Pintar F. A., Sances A., Yoganandan N., Reinartz, J., Maiman D. J., Unger G., Cusick J. F., and Larson S. J.. Biodynamics of the total human cadaveric cervical spine, Proc. 34th Stapp Car Crash Conference, (902309):55-72, 1990.
- Foust D. R., Chaffin D. B., Snyder RG R. G., and Baum J. K.. Cervical range of motion and dynamic response and strength of cervical muscles. Proceedings of the 17th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pages 285-308, 1971.
- Schneider L. W., Foust D. R., Bowman B. M., Snyder R. G., Chaffin D. B., Abdelnovr T. A., and Baum L. K.. Biomechanical properties of the human neck in lateral flexion. Proceedings of the 19th Stapp Car Crash Conference, page 3212, 1975.
- Babcock J. L.. Cervical spine injuries, diagnosis and classification. Arch Surg. 111(6):646-51, June 1976.
- Braakman R. and Penning L.. Causes of spinal lesions In Injuries of the cervical spine. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, 1971.
- Allen B. L., Ferguson R. L., Lehmann T. R., and O'Brien R. P.. A mechanistic classification of closed indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine, 7(1):1-27, 1982.
- Huelke D. F. and Nusholtz G. S.. Cervical spine biomechanics: a review of the literature. J Orthop Res. 4(2):232-45, 1986.
- Crisco J. J. and Panjabi M. M.. Euler stability of the ligamentous human lumbar spine. Transactions of the 36th Annual Meeting of the ORS, 15:607, 1990.
- Torg J. S. and Pavlov H.. Axial load teardrop fracture. In Athletic Injuries to the Head, Neck and Face. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1991.
- Torg J. S., Vegso O. J. J., Neill M. J., and Sennett B.. The epidemiologic, pathologic, biomechanical, and cinematographic analysis of football-induced cervical spine trauma. Am J Sports Med. 18(1):50-57, Jan 1990.
- Pintar F. A., Yoganandan N., Pesigan M., Voo L., Cusick J.F., Maiman D.J., and Sances A. Jr. Dynamic characteristics of the human cervical spine. In Proc. 39th Stapp Car Crash Conference, number 95722, pages 195-202, 1995.
- McElhaney J. H., Fogle J. L., Melvin J. W., Haynes R. R., Roberts V. L., and Alem N. M.. Mechanical properties on cranial bone. J Biomech, 3(5):495 511, Oct 1970.
- Keaveny T. M. and Hayes W. C., A 20-year perspective on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech Eng, 115(4B):534-42, Nov 1993.