This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effects of Large-Radius Convex Rearview Mirrors on Driver Perception
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The U.S. currently requires that reai-view mirrors installed as original equipment in the center and driver-side positions be flat. There has recently been interest in using nonplanar mirrors in those positions, including possibly mirrors with large radii (over 2 m). This has provided additional motivation to understand the effects of mirror curvature on drivers' perceptions of distance and speed. This paper addresses this issue by (1) reviewing the concepts from perceptual theory that are most relevant to predicting and understanding how drivers judge distance in nonplanar rearview mirrors, and (2) reviewing the past empirical studies that have manipulated mirror curvature and measured some aspect of distance perception.
The effects of mirror curvature on cues for distance perception do not lead to simple predictions. The most obvious model is one based on visual angle, according to which convex mirrors should generally lead to overestimation of distances. But convex mirrors affect other perceptual cues (including vergence and accommodation) in ways that lead to predictions of underestimation.
Empirical investigations of the effects of mirror curvature have produced a strong consensus that convex mirrors cause overestimation of distance, but several factors can moderate or compensate for that effect. All quantitative studies of the effects of the radius of convex mirrors have demonstrated less overestimation of distance than predicted by the visual-angle model. Shorter-radius (more strongly curved) mirrors generally lead to greater overestimation of distance. Previous studies have examined the effects of mirror radius up to 2 m. There is strong evidence that 2-m mirrors still cause substantial overestimation, and little indication that reductions in overestimation have asymptoted at that radius.
New empirical efforts to study the effects of larger-radius mirrors, beyond 2 m, could both contribute to basic understanding of how minor curvature affects distance perception, and provide practical information about the possible benefits of using large-radius rearview mirrors.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Flannagan, M., Sivak, M., and Traube, E., "Effects of Large-Radius Convex Rearview Mirrors on Driver Perception," SAE Technical Paper 970910, 1997, https://doi.org/10.4271/970910.Also In
References
- Bowles, T. S. 1969 Motorway overtaking with four types of exterior rear view mirror International Symposium on Man-Machine Systems 2 Transport systems and vehicle control Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
- Burger, W. J. Mulholland, M. U. Smith, R. L. Sharkey, T. J. 1980 Passenger vehicle, light truck and van convex mirror optimization and evaluation studies: Vol. I: Convex mirror optimization HS 805 695 Washington, D.C. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
- Burger, W. J. Mulholland, M. U. Smith, R. L. Sharkey, T. J. Bardales, M. C. 1980 Passenger vehicle, light truck and van convex mirror optimization and evaluation studies: Vol. 2: Evaluation of alternative mirror configurations HS 805 778 Washington, D.C. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
- Erickson, G. A. Allen, P. J. 1989 Vision improvement through computerized design and fabrication of controlled curvature exterior mirrors SAE Technical Paper Series 891636 Warrendale, Pennsylvania Society of Automotive Engineers
- Fisher, J. A. Galer, I. A. 1984 The effects of decreasing the radius of curvature of convex external rear view mirrors upon drivers' judgements of vehicles approaching in the rearward visual field Ergonomics 27 1209 1224
- Flannagan, M. J. 1988 Human performance aspects of rearview mirrors: An applied-literature review Report No. UMTRI-88-20 Ann Arbor, Michigan The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute
- Flannagan, M. J. Sivak, M. Traube, E. C. 1996 Driver perceptual adaptation to nonplanar rearview mirrors Serafin C. Zobel G. Automotive design advancements in human factors: Improving drivers' comfort and performance SP-1155 213 220 Warrendale, Pennsylvania Society of Automotive Engineers
- Mortimer, R. G. 1971 The effects of convex exterior mirrors on lane-changing and passing performance of drivers SAE Technical Paper Series No. 710543 New York Society of Automotive Engineers
- Mortimer, R. G. Jorgeson, C. M. 1974 Drivers' vision and performance with convex exterior rearview mirrors SAE Technical Paper Series No. 740961 New York Society of Automotive Engineers
- Pilhall, S. 1981 Improved rearward view SAE Technical Paper Series No. 810759 Warrendale, Pennsylvania Society of Automotive Engineers
- Platzer, G. E. 1995 The geometry of automotive rearview mirrors: Why blind zones exist and strategies to overcome them SAE Technical Paper Series No. 950601 Warrendale, Pennsylvania Society of Automotive Engineers
- Rowland, G. E. Silver, C. A. Volinsky, S. C. Behrman, J. S. Nichols, N. F. Clisham, W. F. 1970 A comparison of plane and convex rearview mirrors for passenger automobiles Report No. FH-11-7382 Washington, D.C. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
- Seeser, J. 1974 Automotive convex mirrors: Optical properties Technical Report 201 Holland, Michigan Donnelly Mirrors
- Smith, R. L. Bardales, M. C. Burger, W. J. 1978 Perceived importance of zones surrounding a vehicle and learning to use a convex mirror effectively HS 803 713 Washington, D.C. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
- Sugiura, S. Kimura, K. 1978 Outside rearview mirror requirements for passenger cars: Curvature, size, and location SAE Technical Paper Series No. 780339 Warrendale, Pennsylvania Society of Automotive Engineers
- Walraven, P. L. Michon, J. A. 1969 The influence of some side mirror parameters on the decisions of drivers SAE Technical Paper Series No. 690270 New York Society of Automotive Engineers