This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Chest Injury Risks to Drivers for Alternative Air Bag Inflation Rates
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 24, 1997 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
While the present air bag systems have been shown to be highly effective in high severity crashes, undesirable side effects have been reported in some low severity events. The inflation rate of the airbag during deployment has been cited as a factor which induces injuries. A rapid airbag deployment rate is advantageous to provide protection to occupants in severe crashes. On the other hand, airbag aggressivity associated with the high inflation rate can increase injuries in the lower severity crashes. The injury producing forces from the airbag increase as the occupant position becomes closer to the bag at the time of deployment.
This paper describes the results of an analytical study to evaluate chest injury measures for reduced inflation rates of a Taurus type air bag in a variety of crash modes. A detailed nonlinear finite element model of an unfolding airbag and a 50th percentile male Hybrid III dummy are used in conjunction with a test buck to simulate frontal crashes. The model is calibrated for a 30 mph crash, and then used to evaluate the effects of chest loading for other crash modes and air bag flow rates. Different acceleration time histories are introduced to model high speed (35 mph) crashes and low speed (16 mph) pole impacts. A series of parametric simulations are performed for the unbelted dummy by varying the deployment time and the gas flow rate.
A barrier crash at 20 mph was simulated with three variations in flow rate, and occupant position at inflation. The results suggest that a flow rate greater than 60% is desirable to prevent steering wheel contact by the dummy.
Simulations of different crashes indicated that a 75% flow rate reduced chest injury measures in the 35 mph offset crash, and at all cases simulated at severities of 3d mph and below. The 75% flow rate increased chest injury measures in the 35 mph barrier crash.
The simulation of a 16 mph pole crash with late deployment indicated that chest injury readings for this case were higher than in the 35 mph barrier crash. The 75% flow rate reduced chest injury measures in this case by 25%.
Reducing the air bag flow rate to about 75% significantly reduced the chest injury risk to a normally seated, unbelted, 50th percentile male dummy in moderate and low severity crashes. A reduction in the margin of distance between the chest and steering wheel also resulted. However, the 75% flow rate prevented contact with the steering wheel in all cases simulated.
CitationDigges, K., Noureddine, A., and Bedewi, N., "Chest Injury Risks to Drivers for Alternative Air Bag Inflation Rates," SAE Technical Paper 970129, 1997, https://doi.org/10.4271/970129.
Occupant Protection and Injury Assessment in the Automotive Crash Environment
Number: SP-1231 ; Published: 1997-02-24
Number: SP-1231 ; Published: 1997-02-24
- Augenstein, J.S,. and others, “Heart Injuries Among Restrained Occupants in Frontal Crashes”. SAE 970392, 1997.
- Bedewi, N. E., Kan, C. D., Summers, S., and Ragland, C., “Evaluation of Car-to-Car Frontal Offset Impact Finite Element Model Using Full Scale Crash Data”, Proceedings, Session on Offset Frontal Crashes/SAE Congress '95, Detroit, MI, SAE 95065, March 1995.
- Bedewi, N. E., Motewali, V., and Marzougui, D., “Evaluation of Parameters Effecting Simulation of Airbag Deployment and Interaction with Occupants”, International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 1, No.4 pp. 339-354, 1996.
- CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 72nd edition, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida 1991-92.
- Cullen, E., Stabler, K. M., Mackay, G. M., and Parkin, S., “How People Sit in Cars: Implications for Driver and Passenger Safety in Frontal Collisions - The Case for Smart Air Bags”, 40th AAAM Proceedings, October, 1996.
- Dalmotas, D., Hurley, J., German, A., and Digges, K., “Air Bag Deployment Crashes in Canada”, Paper 96-S1-O-05, Fifteenth ESC Conference, May, 1996.
- Hallquist J., “LS-DYNA3D User's Manual”, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, CA 1995.
- DOT Report, “Traffic Safety Facts 1995”, DOT HS 808 471, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, September, 1996.
- Khalil, T. B., and Lin, T. C., “Simulation of the Hybrid III Dummy Response to impact by Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis”, SAE paper No. 942227, 1994.
- Malliaris, A.C., DeBlois J.H., and Digges, K.H., “Air Bag Field Performance and Injury Patterns”, SAE 960659, 1996.
- Malliaris, A.C., “Vehicle Narrow-Object Crashes in Highway Travel” An Investigation conducted for the Crash Analysis Center, George Washington University, DeBlois Associates, Washington, D.C., 1993.
- Martinez, R, “Statement before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Regarding the Effectiveness of Air Bags”, March 7, 1996.
- NHTSA Report, “Fatality Reduction by Air Bags”, NHTSA Technical Report DOT HS 808 470, August, 1996.
- Noureddine, A. A., Digges, K. H., and Bedewi, N. E., “An Evaluation of Deformation Based Chest Injury Criteria using a Hybrid III Finite Element Model”, International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 1, No.2, pp 181-189, 1996
- Prasad, P., and Laituri, T. R., “Consideration for Belted FMVSS 208 Testing”, Fifteenth International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Melbourne, Australia, 1996. Paper No. 96-S3-O-03.
- TRC Crash Test Report No. 208-TRC-93-004, Transportation Research Center Inc., East Liberty, Ohio, November 1992.
- Werner, J. V., Roberson, S. F., Ferguson, S. A., and Digges, K. H., “Air Bag Deployment Frequency and Injury Risks”, SAE Technical Paper No. 960664, 1996.
- Yang, K. H., Pan, H., Larsy, D., and Hoffman, R., “Finite Element Modeling of The Hybrid III Dummy Chest”, AMD-Vol. 126/BED-Vol. 19, ASME 1991.