This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Minimum Crew Certification Human Factors Issues and Approaches
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 01, 1996 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Human factors issues involving the certification of today's transport flight decks are not limited to new aircraft design. To the contrary, most of today's certification activity involves upgrading the flight deck technology of “classic aircraft” or adding new after-market products to current designs. This can include such additions as Flight Management System (FMS) and Global Positioning System (GPS) interfacing to Autopilots and Flight Directors, Multi-Function Control and Display Units (MCDU), Satellite Communications (SatCom) and High Frequency (HF) Data Links, Heads-Up-Display (HUD) technologies, and even complete three-to-two pilot flight deck conversions. All of these changes impact the way in which crews are trained, qualified, and actually operate the aircraft.
This paper reviews the background issues involved with minimum crew certification and describes current methods of workload evaluation in transport category aircraft. Included are a discussion of the relevant sections of current U.S. Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) relating to the evaluation of workload and crew complement; the key elements of a workload evaluation (both its planning and the process); the use of simulation and/or aircraft in the evaluation; qualification and training of evaluation crews; and the design of flight test mission profiles for workload evaluation.
CitationBarnes, R. and Adam, C., "Minimum Crew Certification Human Factors Issues and Approaches," SAE Technical Paper 965510, 1996, https://doi.org/10.4271/965510.
- Abbott, K., Slotte, S.M., and Stimson, D.K. (1996), “Federal Aviation Administration Human Factors Team Report on: The Interfaces Between Flightcrews and Modern Flight Deck Systems,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C.
- Adam, C.F., Barnes, R.B., Orlady, H.W., Ostrovsky, Y.S. (1996), “Human Factors in the International Certification of Transport Category Aircraft,” Human Factors Digest No. 13--Proceedings of the Third ICAO Global Flight Safety and Human Factors Symposium (CIR 266-AN/158). International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
- Barnes, R.B., Orlady, H.O., and Orlady, L.M. (1995), Minimum Crew Certification Workshop (Course #13) Participant's Workbook for the FAA Flight Test Russian Training Program. Robert B. Barnes Associates, Scottsdale, Arizona.
- Corwin, W.H., Sandry-Garza, D.L., Biferno, M.H., Bouchek, G.P. Jr., Logan, A.L., Jonsson, J.E., and Metalis, S.A. (1989), Assessment of Crew Workload Measurement Methods, Techniques, and Procedures, Volumes I and II. Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
- Gawron, V.J., Schiflett, S.G., and Miller, J.C. (1989), Measures of In-Flight Workload, chapter in Aviation Psychology, edited by Jensen Richard S., Gower Publishing Company, Ltd., Aldershot, England.
- McLucas, J.L., Drinkwater F.J. III, and Leaf H.W. (1981). Report of the President's Task Force on Aircraft Crew Complement. Washington, D.C.
- U.S. Congress, The Air Commerce Act of 1926, Washington, D.C.
- U.S. Congress, The Federal Aviation Act of 1958, Washington, D.C.
- U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Regulations, Washington, D.C.
- U.S. DOT, FAA AC 25.1523-1 (Methods of Compliance for Minimum Flight Crew)
- U.S. DOT, FAA AC 120-53 (Qualification and Training of Part 121 Flight Crewmembers)
- U.S. DOT, FAA AC 120-35 (Line Operational Simulations)
- U.S. DOT, FAA AC 120-40B (Airplane Simulator Qualification)
- U.S. DOT, FAA AC 120-45 (Advanced Training Devices-Airplane Only-Evaluation and Qualification)
- U.S. DOT, FAA Order 8110.4A (Type Certification Process)