This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Texas Project: Part 1 - Emissions and Fuel Economy of Aftermarket CNG and LPG Conversions of Light-Duty Vehicles
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 01, 1996 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The Texas Project is a multi-year study of the emissions and fuel economy of aftermarket conversions of light-duty vehicles, including passenger cars, light light-duty trucks, and heavy light-duty trucks. The test fleet, consisting of 86 mostly 1994 model year vehicles, includes eight different types of light-duty vehicles that have been converted to dual fueled operation for either CNG or LPG and corresponding gasoline controls. Virtually every type of aftermarket conversion technology (referred to as a “kit” for convenience) is represented in the test matrix: eight different CNG kits and seven different LPG kits, all of which have closed loop control systems. One goal of The Texas Project is to evaluate the different kits for each of the applications. One method used for evaluating the different kits was by assessing their potential for attaining LEV certification for each of the vehicle applications. For six of the eight vehicle types examined, at least one kit was identified that appears to have the potential for LEV certification. Finally, the fuel economy of each vehicle when operating on the alternative fuel was compared to that for gasoline operation. Although there were exceptions for specific vehicle/kit combinations, based upon a statistical analysis of the fuel economy data, it is concluded that the fuel economy when operating on either CNG or LPG is not statistically different from that when operating on gasoline (when both are expressed on the basis of miles-per-gallon of gasoline-equivalent).
- Ronald D. Matthews - University of Texas at Austin
- J. Chiu - University of Texas at Austin
- J. Zheng - University of Texas at Austin
- D.-Y. Wu - University of Texas at Austin
- D. Dardalis - University of Texas at Austin
- K. Shen - University of Texas at Austin
- C. Roberts - University of Texas at Austin
- M. J. Hall - University of Texas at Austin
- J. L. Ellzey - University of Texas at Austin
- C. Mock - The Alternative Fuels Lab.
- R. B. Wicker - University of Texas at EI Paso
- S. Jaeger - Texas Railroad Commission
CitationMatthews, R., Chiu, J., Zheng, J., Wu, D. et al., "The Texas Project: Part 1 - Emissions and Fuel Economy of Aftermarket CNG and LPG Conversions of Light-Duty Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 962098, 1996, https://doi.org/10.4271/962098.
SAE 1996 Transactions - Journal of Fuels and Lubricants
Number: V105-4 ; Published: 1997-09-15
Number: V105-4 ; Published: 1997-09-15
- Matthews, R.D., Chiu J., Zheng J., Wu D.-Y., Dardalis D., Hall M.J., Ellzey J.E., Mock C., and Love G. (1996), “1995 Annual Report - The Texas Project: Light-duty vehicle conversions to natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas”, Combustion and Engines Research Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.
- Chiu, J., and Matthews R.D. (1996), “The Texas Project: Part 2 - Control system characteristics of aftermarket CNG and LPG conversions for light-duty vehicles”, SAE Paper 962099; also in: SP 1208.
- Wu, D.-Y., Matthews R.D., Zheng J., Shen K., Chiu J., Mock C., and Jaeger S. (1996), “The Texas Project: Part 3 - Off-cycle emissions of light-duty vehicles operating on CNG, LPG, Federal Phase 1 reformulated gasoline, and/or low sulfur certification gasoline”, SAE Paper 962100; also in: SP 1208.
- Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program (1995), “Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) vehicles compared with gasoline vehicles”, Technical Bulletin No. 15, July, 1995.
- Hochhauser, A.M., Koehl W.J., Benson J.D., Burns V.R., Knepper J.C., Leppard W.R., Painter L.J., Rapp L.A., Rippon B.H., Reuter, R.M., and Rutherford J.A. (1995), “Comparison of CNG and gasoline vehicle exhaust emissions: mass and composition - The Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program”, SAE Paper 952507; also in: Auto/Oil Air Ouality Improvement Research Program - Volume III, SAE Special Publication SPA-1117.
- Pahl, R.H., and McNally M.J. (1990), “Fuel blending and analysis for the Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program”, SAE Paper 902098.
- Koehl, W.J., Benson J.D., Burns V. R., Gorse, R.A. Jr., Hochhauser A.M., Knepper J.C., Leppard W.R., Painter L.J., Rapp L.A., Reuter R.M., and Rutherford J.A. (1993), “Effects of gasoline sulfur level on exhaust mass and speciated emissions: the question of linearity - Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program”, SAE Paper 932727; also in: Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program, Vol. II, SAE Special Publication SP-1000.
- Lindhjem, C.E. (1995), “The effect of gasoline reformulation and sulfur reduction on exhaust emissions from post-1983 but pre-1990 vehicles”, SAE Paper 950778.
- Mayotte, S.C., Lindhjem C.E., Rao V., and Sklar M.S. (1994), “Reformulated gasoline effects on exhaust emissions: Phase I: Initial investigation of oxygenate, volatility, distillation, and sulfur effects”, SAE Paper 941973.
- Mayotte, S.C., Rao V., Lindhjem C.E., and Sklar M.S. (1994), “Reformulated gasoline effects on exhaust emissions: Phase II: Continued investigation of the effects of fuel oxygenate content, oxygenate type, volatility, sulfur, olefins, and distillation parameters”, SAE Paper 941974.
- Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program (1995), “Effects of gasoline T50, T90, and sulfur on exhaust emissions of current and future vehicles”, AQIRP Technical Bulletin No. 18, August.
- Sawyer, R.F. (1992), “Reformulated gasoline for automotive emissions reduction”, 24th Symposium (International) on Combustion, the Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, pp. 1423-1432.
- Bass, E., Bailey B., and Jaeger S. (1993), “LPG conversion and HC emissions speciation of a light duty vehicle”, SAE Paper 932745; also in: Advanced Alternative Fuels Technology, SAE Special Publication SP-995, pp. 19-30.
- Whitney, K.A., and Bailey B.K. (1994), “Determination of combustion products from alternative fuels - Part I: LPG and CNG combustion products”, SAE Paper 941903; also in: Progress in Emission Control Technologies, SAE Special Publication SP-1053, pp. 25-38.
- Matthews, R.D., Chiu J., and Hilden D. (1996), “CNG compositions in Texas and the effects of composition on emissions, fuel economy, and driveability of NGVs”, SAE Paper 962097; also in: SP 1208.
- California Air Resources Board, “Preliminary Reactivity Adjustment Factors”, Mobile Source Division, Air Resources Board, State of California Environmental Protection Agency (not dated).
- Environmental Protection Agency (1993), “Exhaust emission certification standards for light-duty vehicles and trucks”, U.S. EPA, Office of Mobile Sources, revised 5/18/93.