This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Energy and Major Diversion in Accident Reconstruction
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Special methods of momentum-based accident reconstruction often are required when path diversions are major, that is, in excess of about 45°.
An energy-based component is well known to be required for the maximal path diversion of 180″; with parallel unknowns the two momentum equations become identical, so that an independent equation based on the observed damage is required. Also-as we demonstrated in a previous paper-in intersection impacts, even with modest path diversions, momentum loss to earth during impact, while classically neglected, appreciably affects the inferred momentum of approach. The present study shows further that, with major diversion and brief travel to rest, conventional neglect of travel during impact may greatly distort the assigned post-impact travel direction and/or distance and, in consequence, the momentum solution.
This paper first checks the validity of “observed” EDSMAC damage, prior to its use as a reference in accident reconstruction, by the reconstruction of speeds and times using elementary physics, for both normal and oblique deformation. Functional peculiarities are discovered in simulations of severe fully symmetric frontal impact.
The paper then checks, against known experimental impacts, the validity of the reference EDSMAC simulations established by Woolley in 1994. Functional peculiarities are discovered in those reference simulations of offset impact.
Checking against the remainder of this reference family, it is shown that for frontal, comer, and side impact the methods of CRASH usually give substantial and sometimes gross errors, mainly due to classical neglect of travel and rebound during' impact, while its extension, CRASHEX, gives results usually quite close to those of EDSMAC.
Comparison of various approaches with the reference cases thus indicates that a fully developed, properly calibrated method of reconstruction can substantially match the reference method of simulation at its best, while sometimes in relevance and always in speed of solution it clearly outperforms the reference.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Trends in Sensing Frontal Impacts |
Authors
Citation
Fonda, A., "Energy and Major Diversion in Accident Reconstruction," SAE Technical Paper 960888, 1996, https://doi.org/10.4271/960888.Also In
References
- “Evaluation of Car-to-Car Frontal Offset Impact Finite Element Analysis Using Full Scale Crash Data,” Bedewi, N Kan, C Summers, S Ragland, C SAE 950650 Feb 1995
- Campbell, K L “Energy Basis for Collision Severity,” SAE 740565 July 1974
- “CRASH2 User's Manual,” Calspan Corporation Nov 1976
- “CRASH3 User's Guide and Technical Manual,” Feb 1981 Apr 1982
- Day, T D Hargens, R L “Further Validation of EDSMAC Using the RICSAC Staged Collisions,” SAE 900102 Feb 1990
- Fonda, A G “CRASH Extended for Desk and Handheld Computers,” SAE 870044 Feb 1987
- Fonda, A G Metz, D L “Post-Impact Spin,” SAE 930653 Feb 1993
- Fonda, A G “Nonconservation of Momentum During Impact,” SAE 950355 Feb 1995
- Fonda, A G “Conservation of Momentum and Energy in Accident Reconstruction,” FORENSIC ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION: MOTOR VEHICLES Michie 1995
- Jones, I S “Results of Selected Applications to Actual Highway Accidents of SMAC Reconstruction Program,” SAE 741179 Dec 1974
- McHenry, R R “A Comparison of Results Obtained with Different Analytical Techniques for Reconstruction of Highway Accidents,” SAE 750983 Oct 1975
- Steffan, H “The Collision and Trajectory Models of PC- Crash” SAE 960866 Feb 1996
- Woolley, R L Kinney, J R “Reference Cases for Comparison of Collision Algorithms Used in Accident Reconstruction,” SAE 940567 Feb 1994