This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comprehensive Laboratory Fuel Economy Testing with RFG and Conventional Fuels
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Reformulated gasoline (RFG) was introduced at retail gasoline stations in the six county Southeastern Wisconsin severe ozone non-attainment area in December, 1994, preceding the mandated January 1,1995, introduction date. By late January and early February a substantial local outcry encompassing health complaints and excessive fuel economy reduction complaints had materialized.
In response to the negative public reaction, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) jointly conducted an investigation of the excessive fuel economy reduction anecdotes in a two week, 15,000 mile on-road test study. The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Center for Alternative Fuels (UWM) performed a follow up investigation of the excessive fuel economy reduction anecdotes at the UWM emissions laboratory under controlled, repeatable conditions.
The objectives of the UWM RFG study were to investigate the possibility of excessive fuel economy reduction anecdotes by measuring the fuel economy of various vehicles, using different RFG types and grades and comparing the RFG varieties containing methyl-tertiary-butyl-ether (MTBE), ethyl-tertiary-butyl-ether (ETBE) and ethanol (EtOH) against conventional gasoline.
Nine vehicles were used in the study including both open-loop control system vehicles and various technology closed-loop vehicles. Eight fuels were used in the study: regular (87 octane) and mid-grade (89 octane) of each type of RFG and conventional gasoline.
The average fleet fuel economy statistics for both the WDNR/EPA and the UWM investigations approximated the nominal 2-3% fuel economy reduction expected based on the energy content reduction of RFG in relation to conventional gasoline. Frequency distributions of the fuel economy results showed a wide deviation about the average. The lower 5 and 10 percentiles of the distribution exhibiting the most severe fuel economy reduction showed excessive fuel economy reduction up to 16% and 14%, respectively. The distribution substantiated that a portion of the anecdotal fuel economy complaints may be valid.
Consistent excessive fuel economy reduction or gain correlations were not found between the various driving cycles, vehicle control technology, and RFG blends.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Kellner, T., Neusen, K., Bresenham, D., Pike, M. et al., "Comprehensive Laboratory Fuel Economy Testing with RFG and Conventional Fuels," SAE Technical Paper 960855, 1996, https://doi.org/10.4271/960855.Also In
References
- Clean Air Act
- Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
- Koehl, William, J. Benson, V. Burns, R. Gorse, A. Hochhauser, R. Reuter “Effects of Gasoline Composition and Properties on Vehicle Emissions: A Review of Prior Studies - Auto/Oil Air Quality improvement Research Program,” SAE Paper 912321 Warrendale, PA 1992
- “Guidance on Estimating Motor Vehicle Emission Reductions from the Use of Alternate Fuels and Fuel Blends,” US Environmental Protection Agency Technical Report EPA-AA-TSS-PA-87-4 Ann Arbor, MI July 21 1988
- Federal Register 56 5352 1991
- Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and US Environmental Protection Agency “On-Road Study of the Effects of RFG on Motor Vehicle Fuel Economy in Southeastern Wisconsin,” March 31 1995
- Federal Registrar § 85.226(a)(2), IM240 Equipment Specifications, Dynamometer Specifications, Power Adsorption
- Federal Register 51 206 October 24 1986 37851
- Hochhauser, Albert Koehl W. Benson J. Painter L. Bums V. Reuter R. Gorse, R. Jr. Rutherford J. “Fuel Composition Effects on Automotive Fuel Economy -Auto/Oil Air Quality improvement Research Program,” SAE Paper 930138 Warrendale, PA 1992
- Ingamells J.C. “Fuel Economy and Cold Stan Driveablility with Some Recent Model Cars,” SAE Paper 740522 June 1974
- Federal Register § 85.2221(e)(1), Vehicle Emission Test Sequence, Transient Driving Sequence
- American Petroleum Institute (API) second