This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparative Emissions from Natural Gas and Diesel Buses
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published December 01, 1995 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Data has been gathered using the West Virginia University Heavy Duty Transportable Emissions Laboratories from buses operating on diesel and a variety of alternate fuels in the field. Typically, the transportable chassis dynamo meter is set up at a local transit agency and the selected buses are tested using the fuel in the vehicle at the time of the test. The dynamometer may be set up to operate indoors or outdoors depending on the space available at the site. Samples of the fuels being used at the site are collected and sent to the laboratory for analysis and this information is then sent together with emissions data to the Alternate Fuels Data Center at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Emissions data are acquired from buses using the Central Business District cycle reported in SAE Standard J1376; this cycle has 14 ramps with 20 mph (32.2 km/h) peaks, separated by idle periods. During the three years of testing, a significant fraction of emissions data was acquired from buses with Cummins L-10 engines designed to operate on either CNG or diesel. The CNG lean burn engines were spark ignited and throttled. Early CNG engines, which were pre-certification demonstration models, have provided the bulk of the data, but data from nine buses with more advanced technology were also available. It has been found that carbon monoxide (CO) levels from early Cummins L-10 CNG powered buses varied greatly from bus to bus, with the higher values ascribed to either faulty catalytic converters or a rich idle situation, while the later model CNG L-10 engines offered CO levels considerably lower than those typical of diesel engines. The NOx emissions were on par with those from diesel L-10 buses. Those natural gas buses with engines adjusted correctly for air-fuel ratio, returned very low emissions data. CNG bus hydrocarbon emissions are not readily compared with diesel engine levels since only the non-methane organic gases (NMOG) are of interest. Data show that NMOG levels are low for the CNG buses. Significant reduction was observed in the particulate matter emitted by the CNG powered buses compared to the diesel buses, in most cases the quantity captured was vanishingly small. Major conclusions are that engine maintenance is crucial if emissions are to remain at design levels and that the later generation CNG engines show marked improvement over the earlier models. One may project for the long term that closed loop stoichiometry control is desirable even in lean burn applications.
- Nigel N. Clark - West Virginia Univ.
- Clarence J. Gadapati - West Virginia Univ.
- Kenneth Kelly - National Renewable Energy Lab.
- Charles L. White - National Renewable Energy Lab.
- Donald W. Lyons - West Virginia Univ.
- Wenguang Wang - West Virginia Univ.
- Mridul Gautam - West Virginia Univ.
- Reda M. Bata - West Virginia Univ.
CitationClark, N., Gadapati, C., Kelly, K., White, C. et al., "Comparative Emissions from Natural Gas and Diesel Buses," SAE Technical Paper 952746, 1995, https://doi.org/10.4271/952746.
- Wang, W., Gautam, M., Sun, X., Bata, R., Clark, N., Palmer, M., and Lyons, D., “Emissions Comparisons of Twenty-Six Heavy Duty Vehicles Operated on Conventional and Alternate Fuels”, SAE Paper 932952, 1993.
- Clark, N., and McKain, D., “Transient Chassis Tests for Heavy Duty Trucks and Tractors” Int. Journal of Vehicle Design (Heavy Vehicle Systems) Vol. 2, No. 2, 1995, pp. 143-159.
- Dietzmann, H E., and Warner-Selph, M. A., “Comparison of Emissions From Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles During Transient Operation”, ASME Energy Sources Conference, Dallas, TX, 1985, ASME Paper 85-DGP-10.
- Clark, N., Messer, T., McKain, D., Wang, W., Bata, R., Gautam, M., and Lyons, D., “Use of the West Virginia University Truck Test Cycle to Evaluate Emissions from Class 8 Trucks”, SAE Paper 951016, 1995.
- Code of Federal Regulations, Part 40, “Protection of the Environment”, July 1, 1993 Revision, Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Record Administration, Washington, DC.
- Poulsen, J, and Wallace, J., “Operating Parameter Effects on the Speciated Hydrocarbon Emissions from a Natural Gas Fueled Engine”, SAE Paper 942007, 1994.
- Sharp, C., Ullman, T., and Stamper, K., “Transient Emissions from Two Natural Gas-Fueled Heavy-Duty Engines”, SAE Paper 932819, 1993.
- Maxwell, T., and Jones, L, Alternative Fuels: Emissions, Economics and Performance, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, Pennslyvania, USA, 1995.
- Nichols, R. J., “The Challenges of Change in the Auto Industry: Why Alternative Fuels?”, ICE-Vol. 20, Alternate Fuels, Engine Performance and Emissions, ASME 1993.
- Messer, T., Clark, N., and Lyons, D., “Measurement Delays and Modal Analysis for a Heavy Duty Transportable Emissions Testing Laboratory”, SAE Paper 950218, 1995.
- Clark, N., Atkinson, C., Lyons, W., Mott, G., and deJong, R., “Development of a Closed Loop Fuel Management System for a Hercules 3.7 Liter Lean Burn Natural Gas Engine”, Annual Automotive Technology Development Contractors' Coordination Meeting, Dearborn, MI, October 24-27, Preprints, Vol. 1, 1994.
- Liss, W., and Thrasher, W., “Natural Gas as a Stationary Engine and Vehicular Fuel”, SAE Paper 912364, 1991.
- Mott, G., Atkinson, C., Clark, N., Atkinson, R., Dejong, R., Latvakoski, T., and Traver, M., “Effect of Fuel Composition on the Operation of a Lean-Burn Natural Gas Engine”, SAE Paper 952560.
- Clark, N., Atkinson, C., McKain, D., and Nine, R., “Speciation of Hydrocarbon Emissions from a Medium Duty Diesel Engine”, In review for 1996 SAE Congress.