This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Effect of Engine Misfire on Exhaust Emission Levels in Spark Ignition Engines
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1995 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
One of the gray areas in the implementation of regulations limiting the generation of pollutants from mobile sources is the actual effectiveness of the exhaust gas emissions control strategy in vehicles that have been in use for some time. While it is possible today to conduct limited diagnostics with the on-board engine computer by performing periodic checks to verify the validity of the signals measured by the on-board sensors, and to measure tailpipe emissions during routine inspection and maintenance, the task of correlating these measurements with each other to provide an on-line, accurate diagnosis of critical malfunctions has thus far proven to be a very challenging task, especially in the case of misfire.
A typical automotive emission control system relies on the measurements provided by various sensors, including for example air charge temperature, intake manifold pressure, exhaust gas oxygen concentration, and engine speed, to adjust the air and fuel mixture as closely as possible to the stoichiometric air-to-fuel ratio (AFR). Maintaining the AFR close to stoichiometry allows the catalytic converter to operate in a high conversion efficiency region, and to significantly reduce the emission of the three major pollutants (for gasoline engines), that is, CO, HC, and NOx. Improper operation of any of the sensors, as well as actual component malfunctions (e.g., a fouled spark plug or fuel injector, or a vacuum or compression leak), may sufficiently upset the delicate balance sought by the electronic controller to cause the mixture to significantly deviate from the desired set point. Such a condition results not only in increased emissions, but possibly in further damage to components (e.g., the catalytic converter), with significant cost to the consumer or to the manufacturer.
It is clearly important to diagnose malfunctions in the emission control system at the incipient stage. Since in practice the first visible “symptom” of a problem with the emission control system may be the measurement of excessive tailpipe emissions during an inspection and maintenance test, it is very important that the exhaust gas measurements be somehow correlated with the health of the emission control system. This is a particularly challenging problem, because the chemistry of exhaust gas production is very complex, and not easily modeled by conventional dynamic system modeling methods. One approach to understanding the correlation between emission control system malfunctions and measured tailpipe emissions is to generate an extensive data base, and to analyze the data to uncover characteristic patterns that may assist in the diagnosis of specific faults. The ultimate aim of the project is to provide a methodology for the development of diagnostic tools that can integrate the information supplied by conventional tailpipe inspection programs with on-board diagnostics to provide fast and reliable diagnosis of misfire.
|Technical Paper||Alternative Technologies for Studying Catalyst Behaviour to Meet OBD II Requirements|
|Ground Vehicle Standard||Application Layer - Diagnostics|
|Technical Paper||The effect of engine misfire on catalytic converter and vehicle emissions|
CitationSoliman, A., Rizzoni, G., and Krishnaswami, V., "The Effect of Engine Misfire on Exhaust Emission Levels in Spark Ignition Engines," SAE Technical Paper 950480, 1995, https://doi.org/10.4271/950480.
- Gertler J. Costin M. “Model-based Diagnosis Of Automotive Engines” Safeprocess Espoo, Finland June 1994
- Herden W. Kusell M. “A New Combustion Pressure Sensor for Advanced Engine Management” SAE 940379
- Heywood J. B. “Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals.” McGraw-Hill Book Company New York 1988
- Krishnaswami V. Luh G. Rizzoni G. “Diagnosis of Exhaust Emissions Control Systems during the EPA Tailpipe Inspection Program” Safeprocess Espoo, Finland June 1994
- Krishnaswami V. Soliman A. Rizzoni G. “A new Generation of On-Board and Service diagnostics for Passenger Vehicles” FISITA Beijing, China October 1994
- Lee D. “Detection of partial misfire in IC engines using a measurement of crankshaft angular velocity” M.S. Thesis The Ohio state University Columbus, OH 1994
- Martin J. K. Plee S. L. Remboski D. J., Jr. “Bum Modes and Prior Cycle Effects on Cyclic Variations in Lean-Burn Spark-Ignition Engine Combustion.” SAE 880201
- Ribbens W. B. Park J. “Road Test Results of an IC Engine Misfire Detection System” SAE 930398
- Ribbens W. B. Park J. “Road Test of a Misfire Detection System” SAE 940975
- Ribbens W. B. Park J. “Application of Neural Networks to Detection Misfires in Automotive Engines” Intl. Conf. on Acoustics, speech and Signal Processing ICASSP '94 April 20-23 1994
- Ribbens W. B. Rizzoni G. “Onboard Diagnosis of Engine Misfires” SAE 901768
- Shiao Y. Moskwa J. J. “Misfire Detection and Cylinder Pressure Reconstruction for SI Engines” SAE 940144
- Shimasaki Y. Kanehiro M. Baba S. Maruyama S. Hisaki T. Miyata S. “Spark plug Voltage Analysis for Monitoring Combustion in an Internal Combustion Engine” SAE 930461