This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Comparison of Time Domain and Frequency Domain Test Methods for Automotive Components
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published November 01, 1994 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Frequency domain testing has had limited use in the past for durability evaluations of automotive components. Recent advances and new perspectives now make it a viable option. Using frequency domain testing for components, test times can be greatly reduced, resulting in considerable savings of time, money, and resources. Quality can be built into the component, thus making real-time subsystem and full vehicle testing and development more meaningful.
Time domain testing historically started with block cycle histogram tests. Improved capabilities of computers, controllers, math procedures, and algorithms have led to real time simulation in the laboratory. Real time simulation is a time domain technique for duplicating real world environments using computer controlled multi-axial load inputs. It contains all phase information as in the recorded proving ground data. However, normal equipment limitations prevent the operation at higher frequencies. For time domain testing the test times are usually optimized by removing low energy levels and high frequencies. This can potentially lead to the elimination of damage causing events for components with high resonant frequencies.
Frequency domain testing approaches the problem from a different perspective. It maintains the frequency content and applied energy levels of the real-world conditions, but the phase differences between axes are not representative of the real world. However, in frequency domain testing it is possible to greatly reduce the test time by using standard techniques, while retaining the frequency content and the low energy levels.
There is always a question as to which test is suitable for each application. The use of both techniques is presented here as a comparison evaluation to aid in the decision making process of developing an appropriate test procedure.
|Technical Paper||Frequency Domain Fatigue Analysis of Exhaust Systems|
|Ground Vehicle Standard||STARTING MOTOR PINIONS AND RING GEARS|
|Technical Paper||Tools for Integration of Analysis and Testing|
CitationSchwab, H. and Konanur, S., "A Comparison of Time Domain and Frequency Domain Test Methods for Automotive Components," SAE Technical Paper 942279, 1994, https://doi.org/10.4271/942279.
- Grenier, G. C., “Fatigue Damage Assessment of Vibration Test Exaggeration Factors”, Society of Automotive Engineers, March 1993.
- Schwab, H. L., “The Development of Vibration Environments for Accelerated Testing of Automotive Components”, Society of Automotive Engineers, November 1994.
- Lins, W. F., et al, “Comparison of Time Domain and Frequency Domain Analysis of Off-Road Vehicles”, Society of Automotive Engineers, April 1969.
- Butkunas, A. A., “Random Vibration Analysis and Vehicle Development”, Society of Automotive Engineers, January 1969.
- Franchini, E., et al, “Full Scale Laboratory Testing”, Society of Automotive Engineers, June 1973.
- Hay, N. C. and Dodds, C. J., “Vehicle Load Histories - - the Duality of Vibration and Fatigue Spectra”, Society of Automotive Engineers, October 1987.
- Tustin, W., “The Future of Random Vibration Screening and Testing in Automotive Engineering”, Society of Automotive Engineers, April 1987.
- Elishakoff, I. and Lyon, R. H., “Random Vibration -- Status and Recent Developments”, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., 1986.
- Soong, T. T. and Grigoriu, M., “Random Vibration of Mechanical and Structural Systems”, Prentice Hall, 1993.