This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Performance of Active and Passive Driver Restraint Systems in Simulated Frontal Collisions
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Event:
Stapp Car Crash Conference
Language:
English
Abstract
The study reports on the results of frontal collisions with 16 cadavers and two Hybrid III dummies with impact velocities of 48 km/h to 55 km/h and a mean sled deceleration of 17 g; mounted to the sled was the front part of a passenger compartment. The cadavers were restrained in the driver position with either 3-point belts (6% and 16 % elongation) and/or air bag with knee bolster and one case was unrestrained. In most cases, both a 12-accelerometer thoracic array and 2 chest bands were employed. In some cases the acceleration at Th6 was measured. The cadavers were autopsied and the injury severity was rated according to the AIS 90. Maximum resultant Th1, Th6, and Th12 accelerations or sternum accelerations in x-direction ranged from 35g to 78g when using 3-point belts and produced injuries ranging from a few rib fractures to unstable chest wall (flail chest). The same range of acceleration values were observed when a driver air bag was used, but three of the four the subjects remained uninjured. Chest deflections of 3 cm to 7 cm were observed by using 3-point belts and/or air bags with knee bolster. The sternum fracture was the typical injury by using 3-point belt systems. The chest band contours showed the torso belt produced a high local compression with resulting higher injury risks, while the air bag appeared to load a larger area of the chest front with less injury risk. Cervical spine injuries of AIS 1 and AIS 2 were observed, independent of using 3-point belt and/or air bag systems. The 3-point belt combined with driver air bag appears to be the best solution for the protection of the head and thorax during frontal collisions. However, further modification of the torso belt's yield characteristic would appear to offer further safety improvements.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Kallieris, D., Stein, K., Mattern, R., Morgan, R. et al., "The Performance of Active and Passive Driver Restraint Systems in Simulated Frontal Collisions," SAE Technical Paper 942216, 1994, https://doi.org/10.4271/942216.Also In
References
- Eppinger RH Augustyn K 1978 Development of a Promising Universal Thoracic Trauma Prediction Methodology SAE Paper No. 780891 Proc. 22nd Stapp Car Crash Conf. 209 268
- Eppinger RH 1989 On the Development of a Deformation Measurement System and Its Application Toward Developing Mechanically Based Injury Indices SAE Paper No. 892426 Proc. 33d Stapp Car Crash Conf. 21 28
- Kallieris D Mattern R Schmidt G Klaus G 1982 Comparison on 3-Point Belt and Air bag - Knee Bolster Systems. Injury Criteria and Injury Severity at Simulated Frontal Collisions Intern. Research Council on Biokinetics of Impact Cologne, Germany 166 183
- Lau I Viano D 1986 The Viscous Criterion - Bases and Application of an Injury Severity Index for Soft Tissue SAE Paper No. 861882 Proc. 30th Stapp Car Crash Conf. 123 142
- Robbins DH Melvin JW Stalnaker RL 1976 The Prediction of Thoracic Impact Injuries SAE Paper No. 760822 Proc. 20th Stapp Car Crash Conf. 699 729
- Walsh MJ Kelleher BJ 1978 Evaluation of Air Cushion and Belt Restraint Systems in Identical Crash Situations Using Dummies and Cadavera SAE Paper No. 760803 Proc. 20th Stapp Car Crash Conf. 107 131
- Yoganandan N Pintar FA Skrade D Chmiel W Reinartz JM Sances A 1993 Thoracic Biomechanics With Air bag Restraint SAE Paper No. 933121 Proc. 37th Stapp Car Crash Conf. 133 144