This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Turbocharging a Bi-Fuel Engine for Performance Equivalent to Gasoline
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
A bi-fuel engine capable of operating either on compressed natural gas (CNG) or gasoline is being developed for the transition to alternative fuel usage. A Saturn 1.9 liter 4-cylinder engine was selected as a base powerplant. A control system that allows closed-loop optimization of both fuel delivery and spark timing was developed. Stock performance and emissions of the engine, as well as performance and emissions with the new controller on gasoline and CNG, have been documented. CNG operation in an engine designed for gasoline results in power loss because of the lower volumetric efficiency with gaseous fuel use, yet such an engine does not take advantage of the higher knock resistance of CNG. It is the goal of this research to use the knock resistance of CNG to recover the associated power loss. The two methods considered for this include turbocharging with a variable boost wastegate and raising the compression ratio while employing variable valve timing. For the first method, which is the subject of this paper, a turbocharger was installed to increase the density of the intake charge and thereby regain the volumetric efficiency lost with CNG. The wastegate was electronically controlled to allow precise control of the engine performance. Equivalent power to gasoline operation with CNG was achieved with the turbocharger. It was necessary to bypass the turbocharger during gasoline operation, on both the inlet and exhaust sides, to avoid knock. Reductions from baseline in hydrocarbon (HC) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions were achieved at power levels equivalent to and slightly higher than the baseline. Brake thermal efficiency values were not significantly different in any case.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Tennant, C., Atkinson, R., Traver, M., Atkinson, C. et al., "Turbocharging a Bi-Fuel Engine for Performance Equivalent to Gasoline," SAE Technical Paper 942003, 1994, https://doi.org/10.4271/942003.Also In
References
- Weaver, CS. “Natural Gas Vehicles - A Review of the State of the Art,” SAE Paper 892133
- Jaaskelainen, H.E. Wallace, J.S. “Performance and Emissions of a Natural Gas-Fueled 16 Valve DOHC Four- Cylinder Engine,” SAE Paper 930380
- Siewart, R.M. Mitchell, P.J. Mulawa, P.A. “Environmental Potential of Natural Gas Fuel for Light-Duty Vehicles: An Engine-Dynamometer Study of Exhaust-Emission-Control Strategies and Fuel Consumption,” SAE Paper 932744
- Atkinson, R.J. Tennant, C.J. Traver, M.L. Atkinson, C.M. Clark, N.N. “A Controller for a Spark Ignition Engine with Bi-Fuel Capability,” SAE Paper Offer 94FL-163
- King, S.R. “The Impact of Natural Gas Composition on Fuel Metering and Engine Operational Characteristics,” SAE Paper 920593
- Tennant, C.J. deJong, R.D. Atkinson, R.J. Traver, M.L. Atkinson, C.M. Vincent, C.J. Clark, N.N. Lyons, D.W. “Performance of a High Speed Engine with Dual Fuel Capability,” SAE Paper 940517
- Kawamura, Y. Shinshi, M. Sato, H. Takahashi, N. Iriyama, M. “MBT Control through Individual Cylinder Pressure Detection,” SAE Paper 881779
- Evans, R.L. Goharian, F. Hill, P.G. “The Performance of a Spark-Ignition Engine Fuelled with Natural Gas and Gasoline,” SAE Paper 840234