This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Occupant Safety of Low-Mass Rigid-Belt Vehicles
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published November 01, 1993 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: Stapp Car Crash Conference
Low-mass vehicles (LMV) are characterized by a total mass of 500 - 600 kg and an overall length of 2.5 m - 3.0 m. In order to provide sufficient transportation capacity, they should be relatively wide (1.7 m) and high (1.6 m). Occupant safety associated with such vehicles poses unique problems. According to published accident and injury statistics, a negative correlation exists between vehicle mass and injury severity in car-to-car crashes. In part, this finding can be attributed to the fact that small vehicles today are designed according to conventional design strategies involving however only a small frontal deformation zone and minimal side protection. For a LMV which is even smaller and lighter than present “small” cars another solution has to be found.
A number of frontal and side impacts staged by our group with the aid of a LMV test device along with a mathematical model analysis indicate that a Rigid-Belt Body (RBB) represents a concept which is well suited for LMVs. In all tests performed, occupant protection criteria were met. Provided that an advanced restraint system be used and the occupant compartment be appropriately designed, it is expected that an adequate occupant safety performance is reached in a RBB vehicle also for the higher Av environment which is anticipated for LMVs in crashes with conventional vehicles with higher mass. It is furthermore argued that the RBB characteristics do not adversely influence car-to-car crash compatibility due to the low mass of the vehicle. Likewise, requirements relating to pedestrian and two wheeler safety can be integrated into the RBB concept.
CitationNiederer, P., Walz, F., Kaeser, R., and Brunner, A., "Occupant Safety of Low-Mass Rigid-Belt Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 933107, 1993, https://doi.org/10.4271/933107.
- Gebauer R Buck W. Wiecking K. Die Fahrgestelle von Personenkraftwagen Belser, Stuttgart 1956
- Partyka S.C. Boehly W.A. Papers on Car Size - Safety and Trends DOT HS 807 444
- Evans L. Mass Ratio and Relative Driver Fatality Risk in Vehicle Crashes. Acc. Anal. and Prev. press
- Fung Y.C. Mechanics of Soft Tissue In: Handbook of Bioengineering Skalak R Chien S. McGraw-Hill NY 1987 1.1 1.12
- Lobdell T. Kroell C. Impact Response of the Human Thorax GM Research Publ. Nr. 1292 1972
- Walz F.H. Kaeser R Niederer P. Occupant and Exterior Safety of Low Mass Cars Proc. IRCOBI 1991 13 24
- Kaeser R Walz F.H. New Safety Concepts of Low Mass Electric/Hybrid Cars ISATA Conf. 1992 1 8
- Kaeser R Walz F.H. Brunner A. Collision Safety of a Hard Shell Low Mass Vehicle Proc. IRCOBI 1992 33 42
- Niederer P. Mathematical Analysis of Restraint System Performance with the Aid of a 2-Dimensional Car Occupant Model Proc. IRCOBI Birmingham 1980 25 34
- Niederer P. Kaeser R Walz F.H. Brunner A Compatibility Considerationsfor Low-Mass Rigid-Belt Vehicles Proc. IRCOBI 1993 press
- Kaeser R Gaegauf M. Motor Car Design for Pedestrian Injury Prevention Int. J. of Vehicle Design, Special Issue on Vehicle Safety 1986 215 231