This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effect of Header Truncation on Monolith Converter Emission-Control Performance
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The steady flow-field inside a monolith catalytic converter was examined by means of water-flow visualization. These tests, conducted with transparent, full-scale converter models with several different header geometries, showed that flow invariably separated from the inlet-header diffuser walls. A constant-diameter jet proceeded to the front monolith face, where it impacted and expanded to cover the substrate frontal area. For some visualization tests, the jet was constrained within a transparent tube which was translated toward the front monolith face, simulating shorter and shorter headers. The monolith internal flow field and pressure loss were found to be unaffected until the tube was within a few centimeters of the substrate. A converter with very short inlet and outlet headers is termed a truncated converter.
The aged conversion-performance characteristics of monolith converters with truncated and conventional (tapered) inlet and outlet headers were evaluated in engine-dynamometer tests. Twelve single- and double-brick converters with volumes of 1.52 and 2.38 L and with Pt/Rh catalyst concentrations of 58 and 37 g/ft3, respectively, were aged on a relatively severe aging schedule to simulate European aging conditions. Ten double-brick converters of 1.8-L volume and 27 g/ft3 Pt/Rh catalyst were aged on a less-severe schedule appropriate to the United States. For both the high-loaded European applications and the lower-loaded U.S. applications, truncating both the inlet and outlet headers caused little or no deterioration either in CO, HC, and NOx warm-up times or in traditional measures of fully warm performance.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Wendland, D., Matthes, W., and Sorrell, P., "Effect of Header Truncation on Monolith Converter Emission-Control Performance," SAE Technical Paper 922340, 1992, https://doi.org/10.4271/922340.Also In
References
- Howitt J. S. Sekella T. C. “Flow Effects in Monolithic Automotive Catalytic Converters,” S.A.E. Paper 740244 February 25 1974
- Lemme C. D. Givens W. R. “Flow Through Catalytic Converters - An Analytical and Experimental Treatment,” S.A.E. Paper 740243 February 25 1974
- Wendland D. W. Matthes W. R. “Visualization of Automotive Catalytic Converter Internal Flows,” SAE Paper 861554 October 6-9 1986
- Bella G. Rocco V. Maggiori M. “A Study of Inlet Flow Distortion Effects on Automotive Catalytic Converters” Journal of Engineering for Power, Trans ASME 113 3 419 426 July 1991
- Miller D. S. Internal Flow Systems 5 BHRA Fluid Engineering Series 1978
- Wendland D. W. Sorrell P. L. Kreucher J. E. “Sources of Monolith Catalytic Converter Pressure Loss,” SAE Paper 912372 October 7-10 1991