This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Formaldehyde Emission Control Technology for Methanol-Fueled Vehicles: Catalyst Selection
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1992 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The use of methanol as a “clean fuel” appears to be a viable approach to reduce air pollution. However, concern has been expressed about potentially high formaldehyde emissions from stoichiometrically operated light-duty vehicles. This paper presents results from an emission test program conducted for the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to identify and evaluate advanced catalyst technology to reduce formaldehyde emissions without compromising regulated emission control.
An earlier paper presented the results of evaluating eighteen different catalyst systems on a hybrid methanol-fueled test vehicle. (1)* This paper discusses the optimization of three of these catalyst systems on four current technology methanol-fueled vehicles. Emission measurements were conducted for formaldehyde, nonmethane organic gases (NMOG), methanol, carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen emissions. The vehicles were operated on a chassis dynamometer using the Federal Test Procedure (FTP), Highway Fuel Economy Test (HFET), and New York City Cycle (NYCC). The three catalyst systems evaluated included, electrically-heated plus original equipment manufacturer (OEM), manifold plus close-coupled, and close-coupled alone. One catalyst system was selected for future short and long term durability testing on each vehicle. Selections were made to achieve a variety of emission control systems that were effective in formaldehyde and regulated emission control. All systems selected for durability evaluations gave average formaldehyde emission levels of less than 15 mg/mi.
CitationNewkirk, M., Smith, L., Ahuja, M., Albu, S. et al., "Formaldehyde Emission Control Technology for Methanol-Fueled Vehicles: Catalyst Selection," SAE Technical Paper 920092, 1992, https://doi.org/10.4271/920092.
- Newkirk, M.S. et al “Formaldehyde Emission Control Technology for Methanol-Fueled Vehicles,” SAE Paper 902118 Tulsa, Oklahoma October 22-25 1990
- “California Methanol Assessment Volume 1: Summary Report,” Jet Propulsion Laboratory, JPL Publication 83 18 1 March 1983
- Whitten, G.Z. Hogo, F. “Impact of Methanol on Smog: A Preliminary Estimate,” Systems Applications, Inc. for ARCO Petroleum Products Company February 1983
- Russell, A. Harris, J. Milford, J St. Pierre, D. “Quantitative Estimate of the Air Quality Impacts of Methanol Fuel Use,” Carnegie Mellon University for the California Air Resources Board and the South Coast Air Quality Management District April 1989
- Sigsby, J.E. et al. “Volatile Emission Compounds from 46 In-Use Passenger Cars,” Environmental Science and Technology 21 5 1987
- Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 86, Subpart B
- Smith, L.R. “Characterization of Exhaust Emissions from Alcohol-Fueled Vehicles,” Coordinating Research Council, Inc. May 1985
- Smith, L.R. Urban, C.M. “Characterization of Exhaust Emissions from Methanol- and Gasoline- Fueled Automobiles,” Report EPA 46013-82-004 August 1982
- Smith, L.R. et al. “Analytical Procedures of Characterizing Unregulated Pollutant Emissions from Vehicles using Middle-Distillate Fuels,” Report EPA 60012-80-068 April 1980
- Dietzmann, H.E. et al “Analytical Procedures for Characterizing Unregulated Pollutant Emissions from Motor Vehicles,” Report EPA 600/2-79-017 February 1979
- Lipari, F. Swarin, S.J. “Determination of Formaldehyde and Other Aldehydes in Automobile Exhaust with an Improved 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine Method,” Journal of Chromatography 247 1982 297 306