This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Cervical Spine Loads Induced in Restrained Child Dummies
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Event:
Stapp Car Crash Conference
Language:
English
Abstract
The cervical spine of young children is normally very mobile. Consequently,relatively little force is required to cause subluxation of the cervical vertebrae. In this respect, the incidence of cervical spine injuries in children involved in car accidents seems to be surprisingly low. However, recent European data seem to indicate that serious cervical spine injuries occur more frequently than had previously been thought. In particular, small children seated in forward facing restraint systems with a harness belt appear to be at risk from tetraplegia in moderate frontal impacts.
To investigate the significance of these findings, TNO has undertaken a research programme to measure the neck loads induced in TNO-P3/4 child dummies seated in various types of restraint system. A series of dynamic sled tests has been performed in which the neck loads induced in a TNO dummy have been measured using a special transducer, which replaces the Atlas-Axis block of the dummy. The design of this transducer and the test results that have been obtained to date are discussed in detail in the present paper. Special attention is focused on how the misuse of restraint systems can affect neck loads, and on the influence of different seating positions. In addition, consideration is given to the significance of free flexural/extensional motions of the P3/4 head. Finally, forward facing and rearward facing systems are compared with each other and child dummy neck loads contrasted with proposed adult tolerance limits.
In parallel with the experimental work, a series of mathematical simulations has been performed, using the MADYMO CVS programme. These analyses have been aimed at studying the effect of chin-to-chest contacts and assessing the impact of headlneck joint characteristics on neck loads. A “Design of Experiments” programme allowing systematic parameter variations has been used to analyse the significance of various test and design parameters.
THE SAFETY OF CHILDREN in passenger cars is an important area in the field of passive safety. Parents, product designers, legislators and researchers have a special duty to this vulnerable group of road users, since young children are not able to make judgements about safety themselves. Severe injuries not only have implications for children and their families in the longer term, but they also place a considerable burden on society.
In the last 10 years, there have been substantial improvements in the design of child restraint systems. Accident investigations in Europe have shown that there are significant advantages in using child restraint systems. Langwieder and Hummel [1](*), for instance, found that for unrestrained children, the risk of serious/fatal injuries is seven times higher than for restrained children. However, their accident data also indicated the occurrence of serious neck injuries in young children restrained by forward facing systems.
At a workshop on child safety in 1986 [2], attended by some 100 experts in this field, serious neck injuries were not considered to be important since they were rarely observed in the accident data available at that time. This view was given further credence by Carlsson et al. [3], who concluded that serious neck injuries were very rare and that in the case of restrained children, only 0.9% were within the AIS 2-6 range.
Langwieder and Hummel [1] reported that neck injuries rank second to head injuries for restrained children. Of all the injuries reported for restrained children, 14% appear to be AIS class 1 neck injuries and 1% AIS class 5. No serious neck injuries were found in comparable data for unrestrained children. Using these results as a basis, Langwieder and Hummel carried out further research in Germany to investigate the extent to which children using restraint systems sustained serious neck injuries in car accidents. In a recent paper [4], they reported on 5 cases of tetraplegia. Four of the children injured in this way were restrained in systems with a 4-point harness belt, when the cars in which they were travelling became involved in ‘moderately severe’ head-on collisions. News of these cases led to the advantages and disadvantages of forward facing versus rear facing child restraint systems being discussed in Europe. It was felt that such cases could not be ignored even though the frequency of serious neck injuries in children appeared to be very low. Moreover, there was agreement that more attention should be given to studying these incidents as this could ultimately lead to better products and improved legislation.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Janssen, E., Nieboer, J., Verschut, R., and Huijskens, C., "Cervical Spine Loads Induced in Restrained Child Dummies," SAE Technical Paper 912919, 1991, https://doi.org/10.4271/912919.Also In
References
- Langwieder, K. Hummel, Th. Children in cars; Their injury risks and the influence of child protection systems Proceedings of the 12th ESV Conference Gothenburg 1989
- Carlsson, G. et al Proceedings Volvo/TNO European Workshop on Child Safety in Passenger Cars Kerkrade 1986
- Carlsson, G. Holmgren, J. Norin, H. The Child in the Volvo Car Proceedings of the 1lth ESV Conference Washington 1987
- Langwieder, K. Hummel, Th. Neck injuries to restrained children Workshop “Future in Child Restraints”, International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impacts Stockholm 1989
- Teng, P. Papatheodorou, C. Traumatic subluxation of C2 in young children Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Societies 32 4 1967
- Weiss, M.H. Kaufman, B. Hangman's Fracture in an Infant American Journal of Disabled Children 126 1973
- Gaufin, L.M. Goodman, S.J. Cervical spine injuries in infants Journal of Neurosurgery 42 1975
- Henrys, P. et al Clinical Review of Cervical Spine Injuries in Children Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 129 1977
- Griffiths, S.C. Fracture of Odontoid Process in Children Journal of Pediatric Surgery 7 6 1972
- Yoganandan, N. et al Epidemiology and Injury Biomechanics of Motor Vehicle Related Trauma to the Human Spine Proceedings of the 33rd Stapp Car Crash Conference SAE paper no. 892438 Washington 1989
- Hubbard, D.D. Injuries of the Spine in Children and Adolescents Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 100 1974
- Aufdermaur, M. Spinal injuries in Juveniles The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 56B 3 1974
- Tarriere, C. About the Conclusions of an International Task Force on Child Restraining systems 13th ESV Conference Paris 1991
- Sturtz, G. 17 8 1981
- Dejeammes, M. et al Exploration of Biomechanical Data Towards a Better Evaluation of Tolerance for Children Involved in Automotive Accidents SAE paper no. 840530 141
- Foust, D.R. Bowman, B.M. Snyder, R.G. Study of human impact tolerance using investigations and simulations of free falls Proceedings of the 21st Stapp Car Crash Conference SAE paper no. 770915 1977
- Fayon, A. Tarriere, C. Proceedings International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impacts 1974
- Melvin, J.W. King, A.I. Alem, N.M. AATD System Technical Characteristics, Design Concepts, and Trauma Assessment Criteria Advanced Anthropomorphic Test Device (AATD) Development Program, Phase 1 Reports: Concept Definition 1988
- Kallieris, D. et al Comparison between child cadavers and child dummy by using child restraint systems in simulated collisions Proceedings of the 20th Stapp Car Crash Conference 1976
- Wismans, J. et al Child Restraint Evaluation by Experimental and Mathematical Simulation Proceedings of the 23rd Stapp Car Crash Conference 1979
- Wismans, J. Stalnaker, R. Maltha, J. Comparison Study of Two 3-Year Old Child Dummies: Part 572 and the TNO-P3 Proceedings of the lnternational lRCOBl Conference on the Biomechanics of Impacts Salon de Provence 1981
- ECE-44 Regulation Uniform Conditions concerning the Approval of Restraint Devices for Child Occupants in Power-driven Vehicles 01 02 03 1981
- Turbell, T. Workshop “Future in Child Restraints” lnternational IRCOBl Conference on the Biomechanics of Impacts Stockholm 1989
- Lupker, H.A. et al Advances in MADYMO Crash Simulations International Congress and Exposition SAE paper no. 910879 Detroit 1991
- MADYMO User Manual 2D TNO Road-Vehicles Research Institute Delft November 1990
- MADYMO Databases Manual TNO Road-Vehicles Research Institute Delft November 1990
- Bosio, A.C. Lupker, H.A. Design of Experiments in Occupant Simulation lnternational Congress and Exposition SAE paper no. 910891 Detroit 1991
- Schoofs, A.J.G. Experimental Design and Structural Optimization Doctoral Thesis Eindhoven University of Technology 1987
- Nagtegaal, R. CADE: Computer Aided Design of Experiments Eindhoven University of Technology 1987
- Langwieder, K. et al Injury Risks of Children in Cars - Epidemiology and Effect of Child Restraint Systems SAE paper no. 905119 1990
- Kramer, F. 12 137 1990
- Viano, D.C. Arepally, S. Assessing the Safety Performance of Occupant Restraint Systems Proceedings of the 34th Stapp Car Crash Conference SAE paper no. 902328 Orlando 1990