This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
User Performance on Typing Tasks Involving Reduced-Size, Touch Screen Keyboards
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 01, 1991 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The prospect of using a touch screen to interact with navigation displays led us to develop and evaluate three reduced-size, touch screen keyboards. One keyboard had a standard QWERTY layout; another had a modified QWERTY layout with keys aligned in a matrix; the third had a matrix of keys arranged in alphabetical order.
Twenty adults varying in age and typing ability participated in the evaluation. Test results showed that subjects typed 25-26% faster on the QWERTY keyboards than on the alphabetical keyboard. The difference in typing speed between the two QWERTY keyboards was not significant. Additionally, differences in error rates among the three keyboards were not significantly different. Eleven out of 20 subjects preferred the standard QWERTY keyboard; 6 preferred the modified QWERTY keyboard; 3 preferred the alphabetical keyboard. These test results suggest that a reduced-size keyboard should employ a standard QWERTY key arrangement to achieve maximum usability.
CitationColeman, M., Loring, B., and Wiklund, M., "User Performance on Typing Tasks Involving Reduced-Size, Touch Screen Keyboards," SAE Technical Paper 912796, 1991, https://doi.org/10.4271/912796.
- Francas, M. Brown, S. Goodman, D. “Alphabetic entry procedure with small keypads: Key layout does matter.” Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 27th Annual Meeting 1983 187 190
- Norman, D.E. Fisher, D. “Why Alphabetic keyboards are not easy to use: Keyboard layout doesn't much matter.” Human Factors 1982 24 5 509 519
- Hirsch, R.S. “Effects of standard versus alphabetic keyboard formats on typing performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology 1970 54 484 490
- Micheals, E.S. “Qwerty Versus Alphabetic Keyboards as a Function of Typing Skill.” Human Factors 1971 13 5 419 426
- Beringer, D.B. “Target size, location, sampling point and instructional set: More effects on touch panel operation.” Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting 1990 375 379
- Leahy, M. Hix, D. “Effect of touch screen target location on user accuracy.” Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 27th Annual Meeting 1990 370 374