This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Systems Durability of a Ceramic Racetrack Converter
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 01, 1991 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The long-term durability of a ceramic racetrack converter is examined using the systems approach. Each of the converter components is characterized with respect to its behavior under simulated mechanical and thermal loads. In particular, the impact of three different washcoats on key physical properties, and the load vs. deformation characteristics of three different insulation mats are examined from mechanical and thermal durability point of view. Similarly, the can deformation at elevated temperature is taken into account to ensure adequate mounting pressure on ceramic monolith under all operating conditions.
The temperature distribution at the midbed of the catalyst during engine dynamometer testing, together with the component properties data, are then used in a finite element model to compute thermal stresses in the monolith as function of engine load and speed. The combined stresses in the monolith (including the effect of radial pressure from the mat) are compared with its high temperature strength and the probability of stress corrosion over the lifetime of the converter is examined using thermal fatigue data for the monolith. In this manner, the engine conditions and converter designs which limit the operating stresses to less than 50% of monolith strength are identified to ensure failure-free operation of the racetrack converter system.
|Technical Paper||Systems Approach to Packaging Design for Automotive Catalytic Converters|
|Technical Paper||Development of Hyundai ULEV system|
|Technical Paper||Exhaust Brakes for Japanese Trucks|
CitationMaret, D., Gulati, S., Lambert, D., and Zink, U., "Systems Durability of a Ceramic Racetrack Converter," SAE Technical Paper 912371, 1991, https://doi.org/10.4271/912371.
- Gulati S.T.; “Long-Term Durability of Ceramic Honeycombs for Automotive Emissions Control,” SAE Paper No. 850130; Detroit, MI; February, 1985.
- Gulati S.T., Brady M.J., Wilson P.J., and Yee M.C.; “Thermal Shock Resistance of Oval Monolithic Heavy Duty Truck Converters,” SAE Paper No. 880101; Detroit, MI; February, 1988.
- Gulati S.T., Summers J.C., Linden D.G. and White J.J.; “Improvements in Converter Durability and Activity via Catalyst Formulation,” SAE Paper No. 890796; Detroit, MI; February, 1989.
- Stroom P.D., Merry R.P. and Gulati S.T.; “Systems Approach to Packaging Design for Automotive Catalytic Converters,” SAE Paper No. 900500; Detroit, MI; February, 1990.
- Gulati S.T.; “New Developments in Catalytic Converter Durability,” Proc. CAPoC-2 Conference, Brussels; September, 1990.
- Gulati S.T., Cooper B.J, Hawker P.N., Douglas J.M.K. and Winterborn D.J.W.; “Optimization of Substrate/Washcoat Interaction for Improved Catalyst Durability,” SAE Paper No. 910372; Detroit, MI; February, 1991.
- Gulati S.T.; “Systems Approach for Reliable Design of Monolithic Ceramic Converters for Automotive Emissions Control,” Simposio de Engenharia Automotiva, Sao Paulo; September, 1989.
- Gulati S.T. and Merry R.P.; “Design Considerations for Mounting Material for Ceramic Wall-Flow Diesel Filters,” SAE Paper No. 840074; Detroit, MI; February 1984.
- Helfinstine J.D. and Gulati S.T.; “High Temp. Fatigue in Ceramic Honeycomb Catalyst Supports,” SAE Paper No. 852100; Tulsa, OK; October, 1985.
- SRM739-L1, Standard Reference Material Catalog, 1990-91; NIST, Gaithesburg, MD
- ANSYS, Swanson Systems; Elizabeth, PA.