This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Impact of Washcoat Formulation on Properties and Performance of Cordierite Ceramic Converters
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The dual requirement of high conversion efficiency and 50K mile durability for cordierite ceramic converters is achievable through optimization of washcoat and catalyst formulation. This paper presents new data for high temperature physical properties, light-off performance, conversion efficiency and pressure drop through an oval cordierite ceramic converter with triangular cell structure and two different washcoat formulations; namely standard vs high-tech. Both of the washcoat systems have a beneficial effect on strength properties with nominal impact on thermal shock resistance. Both the standard and high-tech catalysts provide identical light-off performance for CO, HC and NOx conversion. The high-tech washcoat and catalyst system, in particular, provides consistently superior conversion efficiency for CO, HC and NOx. The pressure drop across the catalyst depends on hydraulic diameter and is only 8% higher for high-tech washcoat than for standard washcoat. The durability and performance of both catalysts are discussed in terms of interaction between the substrate and washcoat system.
Recommended Content
| Technical Paper | Inlet Diffuser Design Techniques |
| Technical Paper | New Developments in Packaging of Ceramic Honeycomb Catalysts |
Authors
Citation
Gulati, S., Summers, J., Linden, D., and Mitchell, K., "Impact of Washcoat Formulation on Properties and Performance of Cordierite Ceramic Converters," SAE Technical Paper 912370, 1991, https://doi.org/10.4271/912370.Also In
References
- Gulati S.T. Summers J.C. Linden D.G. White J.J. “Improvements in Converter Durability and Activity via Catalyst Formulation,” SAE Paper 890796 February 1989
- Gulati S.T. Brady M.J. Willson P.J. Yee M.C. “Thermal Shock Resistance of Oval Monolith Heavy Duty Truck Converters,” SAE Paper 880101 February 1988
- Gulati S.T. “Effects of Cell Geometry on Thermal shock Resistance Catalytic Monoliths,” SAE Paper 750171 February 1975
- Gulati S.T. Pujari V.K. “Mechanical Integrity of Ceramic Monolithic converters,” SAE Paper 811324 November 1981
- Gulati S.T. “Long-Term Durability of Ceramic Honeycombs for Automotive Emissions Control,” SAE Paper 850130 February 1985
- Kattge D. “Advanced Canning Systems for Ceramic Monoliths in Catalytic Converters,” SAE Paper 880284 February 1988
- Gulati S.T. Schneider G. “Mechanical Strength of Cellular Ceramic Substrates,” ENVICERAM '88 Meeting Cologne, W. Germany December 1988
- Oser P. Volker H. “Optimization of Catalyst Systems with Emphasis on Precious Metal Usage,” SAE Paper 872096 November 1987
- Engler B.H. Koberstein E. Volker H. “Three-Way Catalyst Performance Using Minimized Rhodium Loadings,” SAE Paper 872097 November 1987
- Williamson W.B. Summers J.C. Skowron J.F. “Catalyst Technologies for Future Automotive Emission Systems,” SAE Paper 880103 February 1988
- Summers J.C. Williamson W.B. Henk M.G. “Uses of Palladium in Automotive Emission Control Catalysts,” SAE Paper 880281 February 1988
- Summers J.C. Hegedus L.L. “Effects of Platinum and Palladium Impregnation on the Performance and Durability of Automobile Exhaust Oxidizing Catalysts,” J. Catalysis 51 185 1978
- Stroom P.D. Merry R.P. Gulati S.T. “Systems Approach to Packaging Desing for Automotive Catalytic Converters,” Sae Paper 900500 February 1990
- Day J.P. “The Design of a New Ceramic Catalyst Support,” SAE Paper 902167 October 1990
- Gulati S.T. “New Developments in Catalytic Converter Durability,” CAPoC-2 Conference Brussels September 1990
- Gulati S.T. Cooper B.J. Hawker P.N. Douglas J.M. “Optimization of Substrate/Washcoat Interaction for Improved Catalyst Durability,” SAE Paper 910372 February 1991