This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Assessing the Safety Performance of Occupant Restraint Systems
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 01, 1990 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: Stapp Car Crash Conference
The purpose of this study was to investigate approaches evaluating the performance of safety systems in crash tests and by analytical simulations. The study was motivated by the need to consider the adequacy of injury criteria and tolerance levels in FMVSS 208 measuring safety performance of restraint systems and supplements. The study also focused on additional biomechanical criteria and performance measures which may augment FMVSS 208 criteria and alternative ways to evaluate dummy responses rather than by comparison to a tolerance level.
Additional analysis was conducted of dummy responses from barrier crash and sled tests to gain further information on the performance of restraint systems. The analysis resulted in a new computer program which determined several motion and velocity criteria from measurements made in crash tests. These data provide new insights on restraint performance including torso angle change, the effectiveness of occupant restraint from velocity buildup -- called the Restraint Quotient -- and forward displacement and rebound of the chest and pelvis. The various approaches are used to discuss Hybrid III responses from 24 barrier crash and 23 Hyge sled tests.
Four additional experiments were critically evaluated to validate the new analysis. They involved a lap-shoulder belted Hybrid III female dummy with the lap-belt positioned low on the pelvis for restraint or pre-positioned on the abdomen for submarining. By comparing calculated and film analyzed data, the Restraint Quotient program was found to predict accurately those test results.
Numbers relating to FMVSS 208 criteria values were reduced 15%-25% by lap-belt submarining over lap-belt restraint. The addition of an abdominal injury criterion and use of a frangible abdomen helped predict injury risk to the abdomen and an overall higher risk of injury with lap-belt submarining. The use of motion and velocity criteria also identified poorer performance with lap-belt submarining.
Several approaches were reviewed to interpret the overall performance and injury risks of safety systems in a crash. The preferred method was found to be injury risk assessment which represents dummy responses as injury risks using Logist probability functions. This enables injury in each body region to be assessed by the maximum risk from applicable biomechanical criteria. Whole body injury is determined by summing the individual risks from each body region.
The motion and velocity criteria determined from the Restraint Quotient program were useful in complementing the biomechanical criteria to assess injury. They may be helpful in an overall determination of the crash performance of restraint systems, supplements and enhancements.
CitationViano, D. and Arepally, S., "Assessing the Safety Performance of Occupant Restraint Systems," SAE Technical Paper 902328, 1990, https://doi.org/10.4271/902328.
- Transportation Research Board, “Safety Belts, Airbags and Child Restraints: Research to Address Emerging Policy Questions.” Special Report 224, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1989.
- Rouhana, S.W., Viano, D.C., Jedrzejczak, E.A., and McCleary, J.D., “Assessing Submarining and Abdominal Injury Risk in the Hybrid III Family of Dummies.” In Proceedings of the 33rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 257-280, SAE Technical Paper #892440, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1989.
- Rouhana, S.W. and Horsch, J.D., “Assessment of Lap-Shoulder Belt Restraint Performance in Laboratory Testing.” In Proceedings of the 33rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 243-256, SAE Technical Paper #892439, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1989.
- Horsch, J.D. and Hering, W.E., “A Kinematic Analysis of Lap-Belt Submarining for Test Dummies.” In Proceedings of the 33rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 281-288, SAE Technical Paper #892441, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1989.
- Adomeit, D., “Seat Design - A Significant Factor for Safety Belt Effectiveness.” In Proceedings of the 23rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 39-68, SAE Technical Paper #791004, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA 1979.
- Adomeit, D., “Evaluation Methods for the Biomechanical Quality of Restraint Systems During Frontal Impact.” In Proceedings of the 21st Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 913-932, SAE Technical Paper 770936, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA 1977.
- Adomeit, D. and Heger, A., “Motion Sequence Criteria and Design Proposals for Restraint Devices in Order to Avoid Unfavorable Biomechanic Conditions and Submarining.” In Proceedings of the 19th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 139-165, SAE Technical Paper #751146, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1975.
- Viano, D.C., King A.I., Melvin J.W. and Weber K., “Injury Biomechanics Research: An Essential Element in the Prevention of Trauma.” Journal of Biomechanics, 22(5): 403-417, 1989.
- Viano, D.C., and Lau, I.V., “A Viscous Tolerance Criterion for Soft Tissue Injury Assessment.” Journal of Biomechanics, 21(5): 387-399, 1988.
- Viano, D.C., “Biomechanics of Head Injury: Toward a Theory Linking Head Dynamics Motion, Brain Tissue Deformation and Neural Trauma.” SAE Transactions, vol. 97, 1988, 32nd Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper #881708, pp. 1-20, October, 1988.
- Horsch, J.D., “Evaluation of Occupant Protection from Responses Measured in Laboratory Tests.” SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, MI. SAE Technical Paper #870222, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1987.
- Viano, D.C., “Evaluation of the Benefit of Energy-Absorbing Material for Side Impact Protection: Part II.” SAE Transactions, vol. 96, 1987, P-202, 31st Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical paper 872213, pp. 205-224 November, 1987.
- Rouhana, S.W. Personal communication.
- Carsten, 0., “Relationship of Accident Type to Occupant Injuries.” UMTRI-86-15, Final Report, The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, 1986.
- Nygren, A., “Injuries to Car Occupants - Some Aspects of the Interior Safety of Cars.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Supplement 395, ISSN 0365-5237, The Almqvist & Wiksell Periodical Company, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Horsch, J.D., “Occupant Dynamics as a Function of Impact Angle and Belt Restraint.” In Proceedings of the 24th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 417-438, SAE Technical Paper #801310, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1980.
- Horsch, J.D., Schneider, D.C., Kroell, C.K., and Raasch, F.D., “Response of Belt-Restrained Subjects in Simulated Lateral Impacts.” In Proceedings of the 23rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 71-103, SAE Technical Paper 791005, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1979.
- Culver, C.C. and Viano, D.C., “Influence of Lateral Restraint on Occupant Interaction with a Shoulder Belt or Preinflated Air Bag in Oblique Impacts.” In SAE Transactions, vol. 90, SAE Technical Paper #810370, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1981.
- Evans, L. and Frick, M., “Seating Position in Cars and Fatality Risk.” Am J Pub Health 78:1456-1458, 1988.
- Thomas, C., Koltchakian, S., Tarriere, C., et al, “Primary Safety Priorities in View to Technical Feasibility Limited to Secondary Automotive Safety.” In Proceedings of the 1990 FISITA Conference, Milan, Italy, 1990.
- Grosch, L., Baumann, K.H., Holtze, H. and Schwede, W., “Safety Performance of Passenger Cars Designed to Accommodate Frontal Impacts with Partial Barrier Overlap.” In Automotive Frontal Impacts SP-782, pp. 29-36, SAE Technical Paper 890748, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1989.