This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Methods of Processing Cylinder-Pressure Transducer Signals to Maximize Data Accuracy
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1990 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Two disadvantages of using piezoelectic pressure transducers to measure cylinder pressure are the sensitivity of the transducer to temperature and the necessity to reference the output to absolute pressure (pegging). Transducer drift driven by the combustion event, often referred to as thermal shock, enhances measured cyclic variability by exaggerating the effects of actual cyclic variations in combustion temperature. Any artificial variability that persists until the portion of the cycle used for pegging offsets all of the referenced measurements of that cycle by the magnitude of the variability. This study reviews several methods of pegging, and examines the extent to which the four most viable methods propagate thermally-induced intracycle and intercycle measurement variability.
It is preferable to peg when artificial variability is minimized, which occurs when the transducer output is least affected by the thermally transient nature of the engine cycle. Unfortunately, the majority of thermally-induced measurement variability persists throughout the engine cycle and is thus inherent in all pegging procedures. However, this study shows that the pegging procedure selected does have a secondary influence. For the engine used in this study, referencing the transducer output at inlet bottom dead center (IBDC) to intake manifold pressure (MAP) performed best. Equating the average measured pressure during the exhaust stroke to the exhaust backpressure or forcing a fixed polytropic compression coefficient were slightly worse, while forcing a variable polytropic compression coefficient was considerably worse.
CitationRandolph, A., "Methods of Processing Cylinder-Pressure Transducer Signals to Maximize Data Accuracy," SAE Technical Paper 900170, 1990, https://doi.org/10.4271/900170.
- Amann, C. A., “Classical Combustion Diagnostics for Engine Research,” SAE Transactions, Vol. 94, Sec. 1, 1975, Paper 850395.
- Randolph, A. L., “Cylinder-Pressure Transducer Mounting Techniques to Maximize Data Accuracy,” to be presented at the SAE International Congress, 1990.
- Brown, W. L., “Methods for Evaluating Requirements and Errors in Cylinder Pressure Measurement,” SAE Paper 670008.
- Obert, E. F., Internal Combustion Engines and Air Pollution, Intext Educational Publishers, New York, 1973.
- Hohenberg, G. and Killmann, I., “Basic Findings Obtained from Measurement of the Combustion Process,” AVL Publications, 1984.
- Van Hove, W. and Sierens, R., “Possibilities of a Fast Data Acquisition System in Testing IC Engines,” State University of Gent, Belgium, 1986.
- Lancaster, D. R., Krieger, R. B., and Lienesch, J. H., “Measurement and Analysis of Engine Pressure Data,” SAE Transactions, Vol. 84, Sec. 1, 1975, Paper 750026.