This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Investigation of the Correlation between Objective Noise Measurement and Subjective Classification
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Often the perceived annoyance of noise does not correspond with the A-weighted sound pressure level. The disagreement is because of the unique directional and pattern-recognition properties of human hearing. Therefore the importance of psychoacoustic attributes, such as perceived loudness (considering masking effects) roughness (modulation of tonal components), sharpness (relationship of high-frequency components to low-frequency ones), harmony (distribution of tonal components), spatial selectivity and so on, is becoming appreciated. The correlation of objective measurement and subjective classification of noise can be improved by considering the final receiver, “human hearing”, and developing methods of deriving and analyzing metric data based on human hearing.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Genuit, K. and Gierlich, H., "Investigation of the Correlation between Objective Noise Measurement and Subjective Classification," SAE Technical Paper 891154, 1989, https://doi.org/10.4271/891154.Also In
References
- Aures W. Berechnungsverfahren fur den Wohlklang be-liebiger Schallsignale Beitrag zur gehorbezogenen Schallanalyse, Dissertation TU Munchen 1984
- Blauert J. Binaural localization: Multiple images and applications in room- and electroacoustics Gatehouse R.W. Localization of sound: Theory and application The Amphora Press Groton, CT 65 84
- Chung J.Y. Cross-Spectral Method of Measuring Accustic Intensity Without Error Caused by Instrument Phase Mismatch J.Acoust. Soc Am. 62 1613 1616
- DIN 45 631 Berechnung des Lautstarkepegels aus dem Gerauschspektrum, Verfahren n. ZWICKER 1965
- Fahy F.J. Measurement of Acoustic Intensity Using the Cross-Spectral Density of Two Microphone Signals J.A.S.A 62 1977 4 1057 1059
- Fastl H. Roughness and temporal masking patterns of sinusoidally amplitude modulated broadband noise Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing Academic Press London 403 1977
- Friedlein J. “Kunstkopfstereophonie” ein objektives Verfahren in der Gerauschbewertung, VDI-Tagungsband Nr.: T-30-602-058-5, 06.85
- Genuit K. Ein Modell zur Beschreibung der Auβenohr-übertragungseigenschaften, Dissertation TH Aachen 1984
- Genuit K. A Special Calibratable Artifidal-Head-Measurement-System for Subjective and Objective Classification of Noise INTERNOISE 21. 23 7 1986 Cambridge Massachusetts 1313 1318
- Genuit K. Investigation and Simulation of Vehicle Noise Using the Binaural Measurement Technique SAE’87 No. 870959 97 104 Traverse City/Michigan 04.87
- Genuit K. Problems of Measuring the Annoyance of Noise, Internoise 87 Peking/China
- Genuit K. Noise Control with Consideration of the Human-Hearing NOISE-CON 88 West Lafayette Indiana 427 432
- H.; Hovel vom Zur Bedeutung der Obertragungseigen-schaf ten des Auβenohres sowie des binauralen Hor-systems bei gestörter Sprachübertragung Diss. TH Aachen 1984
- ISO 532 Methods for calculating loudness level
- Terhardt E. Pitch, consonance and harmony J. Acoust. Soc.Am. 55 1061 1974
- Terhardt E. Stoll G. Seewann M. Algorithm for extraction of pitch and pitch salience from complex tonal signals J. Acoust. Soc.Am. 71 1982 679 688
- Terhardt E. Aures W. Wahrnehmbarkeit der periodi-schen Wiederholung von Rauschsignalen Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA 84 769 772
- Zwicker E. Procedure for calculating loudness of temporally variable sounds J. Acoust. Soc.Am. 62 675 682 1977
- Zwicker E. Psychoakustik, Hochschultext, Springer Verlag Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1982