This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Driver Perception Response Time
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1989 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The time that it takes a driver to perceive and respond to an unexpected situation is of considerable interest to those who design the roadway system as well as in many instances of litigation resulting from motor vehicle crashes. In this paper the subject of driver perception-response time is reviewed. It begins by describing the necessary steps in perception-response, then reviews the available literature on the subject. Various factors that can affect perception-response time are covered, and recommendations are offered.
|Technical Paper||Perception/Reaction Time Values for Accident Reconstruction|
|Technical Paper||Visibility Problems in Nighttime Driving|
|Technical Paper||Development and Evaluation of Driver Response Time Predictors Based upon Meta Analysis|
CitationOlson, P., "Driver Perception Response Time," SAE Technical Paper 890731, 1989, https://doi.org/10.4271/890731.
Motor Vehicle Accident Reconstruction-Review and Update
Number: SP-0777 ; Published: 1989-02-01
Number: SP-0777 ; Published: 1989-02-01
- PerchonokK. and PollackL., Luminous Requirements for Traffic Signs. Contract No. FHWA-RD-81-158. Federal Highway Administration Washington, D. C. December, 1981.
- DamonA., StoudtH. W., and McFarlandR. A., The Human Body in Equipment Design. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press. 1966.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Report on Massachusetts Highway Accident Survey. Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1934.
- DeSilvaH. R., and ForbesT. W., Driver Testing Results, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Harvard Traffic Bureau. 1937.
- ListerR. D., The Reaction Time of Drivers in Moving and Stationary Vehicles. Road Research Laboratory Note No. RN/1324/RDL. March, 1950.
- OlsonP. L., ClevelandD. E., FancherP. S., KostyniukL. P., and SchneiderL. W., Parameters Affecting Stopping Sight Distance. Washington, D.C. The National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Report 270. June, 1984.
- KonzS., and DaccarettJ., Controls for Automotive Brakes. Washington, D. C. The Highway Research Board, 1967, 195, 75-79.
- NaglerC. A., and NaglerW. M., Reaction Time Measurements. Forensic Science. 1973, 2, 261-274.
- BarrettG. V., KobayashiM., and FoxB. H., Feasibility of Studying Driver Reaction to Sudden Pedestrian Emergencies in an Automobile Simulator. Human Factors. 1982, 24, 19-24.
- JohanssonG., and RumarK., Driver-s Brake Reaction Times. Human Factors. 1971, 13(1), 23-27.
- GazisD., HermanR., and MaradudinA, The Problem of the Amber Signal Light on Traffic Flow. Operations Research. 1960, 8, 112-132.
- WortmanR. H., and MatthiasJ. S., An Evaluation of Driver Behavior at Signalized Intersections. Final Report. Arizona Transportation and Traffic institute. Tucson, Arizona. 1983.
- Alien Corporation of America. Field Validation of Taillights - Report on Phase 1: Pilot Testing. Alexandria, Virginia. US Department of Transportation, NHTSA Contract No. DOT-HS-7-01756. April, 1978.
- SivakM., OlsonP. L., and PostD. V., Evaluation of Experimental (Including High-Mounted) Configurations of Brake Lamps in Actual Traffic. Ann Arbor, Michigan. The Highway Safety Research Institute. Report No. UM-HSRI-79-87. November, 1979.
- SivakM., OlsonP. L., and FarmerK. M. High-Mounted Brake Lights and the Behavior of Following Drivers. Ann Arbor, Michigan. The Highway Safety Research Institute. Report No.UM-HSRI-81-31. July, 1981.
- SummalaH., Driver-s Steering Reaction to a Light Stimulus on a Dark Road. Ergonomics. 1981, 24, 125-131.
- SummalaH., Driver/Vehicle Steering Response Latencies. Human Factors. 1981, 23, 683-692.
- McGeeH. W., HooperK. G., HughesW. E. and BensonW. Highway Design and Operations Standards Affected by Driver Characteristics. Volume II: Final Technical Report. Bellomo-McGee, Inc. Vienna, Virginia. Report No. FHWA-RD-83-015. 1983.
- TriggsT. J. and HarrisW. G. Reaction Time of Drivers to Road Stimuli. Clayton, Victoria, Australia. Monash University Human Factors Group. Report No. HFR-12. June, 1982.
- ChilesW. D. and JenningsA. E. Effects of Alcohol on Complex Performance. Washington, D. C. Federal Aviation Agency. 1969.
- MoskowitzH., HulbertS. and McGlothlinW. H. Marijuana: Effects on Simulated Driving Performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention.8(1), 45-50, 1976.
- ListerH. O., DuremanI., EricssonS. and KarlssonN. G. Effects of Prolonged Driving Upon a Subsidiary Serial Reaction Time. 1. Comparison With Brake Reaction Time to Stimuli on the Road. 2 Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Night Driving, Uppsala University , Department of Psycholgy Sweden, 1968.
- LaurellH. and LisperH. O. Changes in Subsidiary Reaction Time and Heart-Rate During Car Driving, Passenger Travel’ and Stationary Conditions, Uppsala University, Department of Psychology. Sweden, 1976.
- MutoW. H. and WierwilleW. W. The Effect of Repeated Emergency Response Trials on Performance During Extended-Duration Simulated Driving. Human Factors. 24(6), 693-698, 1982.
- CorfitsenM. T. Increased Viso-Mororic Reaction Time of Young, Tired, Drunk Drivers. Forensic Science International. 20(2), 121-125, 1982.
- American Automibile Association, Traffic Engineering and Safety Department. Age and Complex Reaction Time. Report No. 41, 1952.
- American Automobile Association, Traffic Engineering and Safety Department. Reaction Time as Related to Age. Report No. 69. 1966.