This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Comparison of the Ground-Plane-Suction and Moving-Belt Ground-Representation Techniques
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1988 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Wind-tunnel tests with various model cars of around 1:5 scale have shown that results similar to those recorded with a moving-belt system can be obtained with a fixed ground-plane with distributed suction. In a few cases, differences were found between drag and lift measurements made with the two ground-representation methods. Some of these differences could be attributed to the lack of wheel rotation with the suction ground-plane.
The fixed ground-plane with distributed suction and provision for wheel rotation is therefore proposed as a more convenient alternative to a moving-belt system for full-scale testing.
CitationCarr, G., "A Comparison of the Ground-Plane-Suction and Moving-Belt Ground-Representation Techniques," SAE Technical Paper 880249, 1988, https://doi.org/10.4271/880249.
- Carr, G W ‘An improved Moving-Ground System in the MIRA Model Wind Tunnel’. MIRA Report No 1987/2.
- Gould, R W F ‘Measurements of the Wind Forces on a Series of Models of Merchant Ships’. NPL Aero Report 1233. April 1967.
- Rose, M J ‘Ground Representation in Automotive Wind Tunnel Tests. A Further Study of Moving-Ground Effects’. MIRA Report No 1986/1.