This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Design and Enforcement of I/M Programs for Maximum Effectiveness
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published November 01, 1985 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Inspection and maintenance (I/M) programs are intended to minimize motor vehicle emissions through the identification and repair of defective vehicles. Laboratory studies have indicated I/M has the potential to reduce hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions by in excess of 25%; however, many of the I/M programs currently operating in the United States may be achieving only minimal emission reductions.
In order for the “theoretical” benefits of I/M to be achieved, certain program design features and enforcement procedures are necessary. The important elements of an effective I/M program include stringent emission standards, effective inspection procedures, effective repair requirements, minimal use of waivers, an effective compliance mechanism, reasonable inspection fees, and data analysis and surveillance procedures that identify individuals who are improperly performing inspections and repairs. In addition, the agency responsible for the program must have the resources necessary to ensure that corrective action is taken when problems are identified.
I/M programs recently implemented in the state of Alaska represent an attempt to maximize emission reductions in “decentralized” or “private garage” I/M programs. Preliminary results indicate that significant benefits are being achieved. Data analysis is also identifying those mechanics who are reporting invalid data, failing to repair an excessive number of vehicles, or reporting visual inspection failure rates that are much higher or much lower than the norm.
CitationAustin, T. and Husson, L., "Design and Enforcement of I/M Programs for Maximum Effectiveness," SAE Technical Paper 852108, 1985, https://doi.org/10.4271/852108.
- Austin T.C. Rubenstein, G.S. “A Comparison of Private Garage and Centralized I&M Programs,” SAE paper no. 790785 1979
- Rubenstein, G. et al. “Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance - The California Program,” SAE paper no. 750557 1976
- “BAR Says I/M Program Running Smoothly,” CVS Hews , Sierra Research, Inc. 1984
- Noddings, D. “Recommendations Regarding the Selection of Idle Emissions Inspection Outpoints for Inspection and Maintenance Programs,” Report No. EPA-AA-IMS/81-1, Emission Control Technology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1981
- Vintilla, S. “Recommendations Regarding the Selection of Idle Emission Outpoints for Inspection and Maintenance Programs Requiring Only Carbon Monoxide Emission Reductions,” Report No. EPA-AA-IMS/81-13, Emission Control Technology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1981
- McMullen, K. “Vehicle Emissions Analysis Program 1982,” Environmental Services Division, Fairbanks North Star Borough
- “First Annual Report to the Legislature on the Mandatory Vehicle Inspection Program,” Department of Consumer Affairs and California Air Resources Board, State of California 1979
- “I/M Program Design -Fairbanks North Star Borough,” Sierra Research, Inc. 1985
- Ashby, H.A. “The Portland Study” Report No. EPA-AA-TEB-82-7, Emission Control Technology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1982