This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of On-Road and Wind-Tunnel Tests for Tractor-Trailer Aerodynamic Devices, and Fuel Savings Predictions
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Wind tunnels which are large enough for full-scale trucks are rare, and the cost of satisfactorily-detailed models for smaller tunnels is high. The work presented shows the results from the application of a method which provides an over-the-road evaluation of the incremental changes in fuel consumption and drag coefficient produced following the addition of a variety of aerodynamic drag reducing devices to a tractor-trailer truck combination. The devices tested were an aerodynamic sunvisor, a roof-mounted air deflector, cab extenders, cab skirts, a trailer nose fairing, a set of trailer quads (quarter-rounds), and trailer skirts which were mounted on a low-forward-entry tractor and high box-van trailer. The significant differences between the wind tunnel and on-road drag reductions suggest that the effects of on-road wind turbulence can substantially reduce the wind tunnel results even though a 1.5% turbulence intensity level was used in the tunnel experiments. These experiments have highlighted that the wind tunnel results were optimistic and suggest a need for on-road testing to more accurately evaluate the benefit of aerodynamic devices for trucks. The on-road results finally are used to predict the resultant fuel economies for various loads and speed conditions.
Recommended Content
Authors
- Jeffrey W. Saunders - Dept. of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Melbourne, Australia
- Simon Watkins - Dept. of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Melbourne, Australia
- Peter H. Hoffmann - Dept. of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Melbourne, Australia
- Frank T. Buckley - Mechanical Engineering Dept. University of Maryland College Park, MD
Topic
Citation
Saunders, J., Watkins, S., Hoffmann, P., and Buckley, F., "Comparison of On-Road and Wind-Tunnel Tests for Tractor-Trailer Aerodynamic Devices, and Fuel Savings Predictions," SAE Technical Paper 850286, 1985, https://doi.org/10.4271/850286.Also In
References
- Cooper K. R. “The Wind Tunnel Simulation of Surface Vehicles” Jour. Wind. Eng. & Ind. Aero. 17 1984 167 198
- Buckley, F. T. Jr. Marks C. H. Walston, W. H. Jr. “Analysis of Coast Down Data to Assess the Aerodynamic Drag on Full-Scale Vehicles in Windy Environments” SAE Transactions 85 September 1976
- Buckley, F. T. Jr. Walston H. H. Jr. Marks C. H. “Fuel Savings from Truck Aerodynamic Drag Reducers and Correlation with Wind-Tunnel Data” AIAA Journal of Energy 2 6 December 1978
- Buckley, F. T. Jr. “Some Effects of Free-Stream Turbulence and the Presence of the Ground on the Flow Around Bluff Bodies” Proceedings of the Symposium on Aerodynamic Drag Mechanisms of Bluff Bodies and Road Vehicles General Motor Research Laboratories Warren, Michigan September 1976 Plenium Press 1978
- Cooper K. R. “A Wind-Tunnel Investigation into the Fuel Savings Available from the Aerodynamic Drag of Trucks” DME/NAE Quarterly Bulletin No. 1976(3) National Research Council of Canada October 1976
- Kettinger J. N. “Tractor-Trailer Fuel Savings with an Aerodynamic Device - A comparison of Wind Tunnel and On-Road Tests” SAE Paper 820376 February 1982
- Saunders J. W. Melbourne W. H. “Tall Rectangular Building Response to Crosswind Excitation” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures Eaton K. J. Cambridge Univ. Press 1975 369 379
- Laneville A. Gartshore I.S. Parkinson G.V. “An explanation of some of the effects of turbulence on bluff bodies” proc. 4th International Conference on Wind Effects on Structures Heathrow 1975 333 341
- Bearman P. W. Morel T. “Effect of Free Stream Turbulence on the Flow around Bluff Bodies” Prog. Aerospace Sci. 20 97 123 1983
- Panofsky H. A. Vilardo M. Lispschutz R. “Terrain Effects on Wind Fluctuations.” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Wind Engineering Fort Collins, Colo., USA Cermak J. July 1979 173 177
- E.S.D.U. “Characteristics of Atmospheric Turbulence near the ground - Part II: Single Point Data from Strong Winds (Neutral Atmosphere)” Engineering Sciences Data Unit (U.K.) Data Item 74031 1974 1982
- Watkins S. “Commercial Vehicle Aerodynamics - Wind Tunnel and Road Comparison” Dept. of Mech. & Prod. Eng. RMIT Australia 1985
- Cooper R. K. “Atmospheric Turbulence with Respect to Moving Ground Vehicles.” Jour. Wind, Eng. & Ind. Aero. 17 1984 215 238
- Hird T. “An Industrial Wind Tunnel Design and Construction” Vehicle Aerodynamic Group Report WTR 1001 Dept. Mech. & Prod. Eng. Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology July 1980
- SAE Wind Tunnel Test Procedure for Trucks and Buses - SAE J1252 August 1979
- Wing W. “Ground Simulation in Automotive Hind Tunnels - A Survey” Vehicle Aerodynamic Group Report WTR 1005 Dept. Mech. & Prod. Eng. Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology July 1981
- Gilhaus A. “The Influence of Cab Shape on Air Drag of Trucks” 4th Colloquium on Industrial Aerodynamics Aachen, Germany June 1980
- Buckley, F. T. Jr. “An Improved Over-the-Road Test Method for Determining the Fuel Saving Benefit on a Truck Aerodynamic Drag Reducing Device” SAE Congress Detroit Feb. 1985
- Buckley, F. T. Jr. “Aspects of Over-the-Road Testing of Truck Aerodynamic Drag Reducing Devices” SAE Trans. 91 1982