This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Regulation, Deregulation and their Effects on Future Commuter Aircraft
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 01, 1984 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The traditional dividing line between small and large commercial transports has been based upon weight and passenger capacity. Airworthiness regulations have been matched to operating rules for each category in a way that permitted considerable economics to the smaller aircraft by comparison with the large.
As technology and passenger demand both advance, this dividing line has become increasingly blurred, through extensions of both weight and passenger capacity as a means of preserving sensible public service, with the result that the development of a new family of commuter aircraft, larger than previously permitted though still smaller than existing jet equipment, has been encouraged.
In spite of this equipment stimulus, growth in the commuter market remains unpredictable, accenting the need for flexibility of design to permit ready adaptation to each new need. It is suggested that the combination of new structural technologies coupled with wider application of systems design practices normally associated with larger aircraft, offers a means of economically providing such flexibility of design. The burgeoning range of smaller energy efficient turboprop engines appears to match this opportunity. In the event that Part 23 of the Federal Aviation Requirements is amended to include aircraft of up to 19,000 lb. gross weight, an opportunity exists to develop a new generation of commuter aircraft with enough flexibility to keep pace with commuter airline needs in the U.S.A.
|Commuter Turboprop Propulsion Technology
|The Aircraft Regenerative Turbine Engine: Where Now?
|Prop-Fan Propulsion -Its Status and Potential
CitationDavy, M. and Toplis, A., "Regulation, Deregulation and their Effects on Future Commuter Aircraft," SAE Technical Paper 841630, 1984, https://doi.org/10.4271/841630.
- Civil Aeronautics Board “Handbook of Airline Statistics” 1967 Bureau of Accounts and Statistics Washington, D.C.
- Civil Aeronautics Board “Handbook of Airline Statistics”” 1973 Bureau of Accounts and Statistics Washington, D.C.
- Commuter Airline Association of America Annual Report Number 5 – CAA Washington, D.C. October 1977
- Davy M.C.W. Martin P.S. “10 Years of STOL - The Twin Otter's First Decade” SAE Paper 750596 Air Transportation Meeting Hartford. Conn. May 6-8, 1975
- The de Havilland Aircraft of Canada “An Inter-city STOL Transportation System” CAB Northeast Corridor VTOL Investigation, CAB Docket 19078 Direct Exhibits
- Civil Aeronautics Board “Northeast Corridor VTOL Investigation” Docket 19078, Initial decision of examiner, E. Robert Seaver Washington, D.C. February 2 1970
- Cooper D. Castleberry G. “The Feasibility of Establishing Downtown STOLports in New York City, Los Angeles and Chicago” FAA Office of Aviation Policy & Plans Washington, D.C. September 1 1969
- Regional Airline Association “1983 Annual Report” Washington, D.C. June 1984
- Eggleston B. “R and D in the Evolution of the Dash 8” ” CAS1 Fifth Canadian Symposium on Advanced Technology, Light and General Aircraft Ottawa, Ontario May 28-30, 1984