This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Comparison of Corrosion Test Methods for Painted Galvanized Steel
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1982 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Various galvanized steels, ZINCROMETAL and cold-rolled steel were painted with automotive-type paints and tested via accelerated, atmospheric and on-vehicle tests. Tests indicate that the ASTM B117 salt fog test and the Kesternich SO2 test do not yield results which are indicative of automotive, in-service corrosion performance. A modified Volvo scab corrosion test was found to offer an accelerated method to accurately predict automotive, in-service corrosion performance. Galvanized steels exhibited corrosion resistance which was far superior to ZINCROMETAL and cold-rolled steel. Thicker zinc coatings on steel were found to offer better corrosion protection to painted substrates.
|Technical Paper||Paintability Performance of Metallic Coated Steels|
|Technical Paper||Recycling of Copper/Brass Radiators|
CitationNowak, E., Franks, L., and Froman, G., "A Comparison of Corrosion Test Methods for Painted Galvanized Steel," SAE Technical Paper 820427, 1982, https://doi.org/10.4271/820427.
- Hospadaruk, V. Huff, J. Zurilla, R. W. Greenwood, H. T. “Paint Failure, Steel Surface Quality and Accelerated Corrosion Testing,” Paper 780187 National SAE Meeting Detroit 1978
- Westberg J. Borjesson, L. “Influence of Sheet Metal Surface Conditions on the Corrosion Properties of Automotive Paint Systems,” Paper 278 International Corrosion Forum Chicago 1980