This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Performance of a Shoulder Belt and Knee Restraint in Barrier Crash Simulations
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1979 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Previous pendulum impact tests have shown that knee joint injuries and tibial-fibular fractures may occur when loads are directed against the lower leg rather than directly against the femur in the knee. In order to further improve our understanding of lower extremity restraint mechanics, simulated frontal barrier crash experiments were conducted with unembalmed human cadavers and an anthropomorphic dummy restrained by a two-point shoulder belt. In the first test, an experimental bolster was specifically positioned so that the cadaver's lower leg would strike the bolster, thus inducing restraining loads entirely below the knee joint. The analysis of occupant kinematics showed that the flexed knee rode over and forward of the low-positioned bolster. Restraint induced considerable shearing load across the knee joint. Bolster measurements indicated a peak load of approximately 4.0 kN per leg which resulted in a contralateral central tear of the posterior cruciate ligaments.
Factors influencing the performance of a shoulder belt and knee restraint system were studied in the remaining experiments. Positioning the bolster to provide full knee contact and early femoral loading, and orienting the bolster face to reduce knee joint shear loads (∼ 38.5° from horizontal) were identified as important parameters for improved performance of the knee restraint in these tests. The reaction force vector of the deforming bolster structure (∼ 32.5° from horizontal) represented an additional independent factor in minimizing contact loads and in controlling occupant kinematics. Under these knee restraint conditions, an average peak bolster reaction force of 6.2 kN per leg (compared with a dummy femur load of 5.9 kN) did not result in injury to the lower extremity of four cadavers. The experiments indicated that a two-point shoulder belt and knee restraint system can control occupant kinematics and attenuate potential lower extremity injury during a 13.4 m/s frontal crash simulation.
|Technical Paper||Influence of Arm Position on Thoracic Injuries in Side Impact|
|Technical Paper||Whole-body Kinematic and Dynamic Response of Restrained PMHS in Frontal Sled Tests|
CitationViano, D. and Culver, C., "Performance of a Shoulder Belt and Knee Restraint in Barrier Crash Simulations," SAE Technical Paper 791006, 1979, https://doi.org/10.4271/791006.
- Viano D. C. Culver C. C. Haut R. C. Melvin J. W. Bender M. Culver R. H. Levine R. S. “Bolster Impacts to the Knee and Tibia of Human Cadavers and a Hybrid III Dummy,” Proceedings of the 22nd Stapp Car Crash Conference, Society of Automotive Engineers: SAE 780896 401 428 1978
- Culver C. C. Viano D. C. “Factors Influencing Knee Restraint,” Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper Series: SAE 790322 1 16 1979