This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Design and Analysis of Propellers for Low Reynolds Number Application to Mini-RPV's
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1977 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: Aerospace Meeting
This report presents the design and analysis of propellers applied to mini-remotely piloted vehicles along with the methods used. Modifications to the airfoil data used for predicting the profile drag losses were necessary to account for operation at the low Reynolds number encountered by mini-RPV propellers. The correction was determined from the available airfoil data and low Reynolds number propeller test data. Using the revised methods of propeller analysis, optimum propellers were designed and analyzed. The study showed that improved performanced can be obtained with new propeller designs.
This study was conducted under contract No. DAAJ02-76-C-0031 with the Eustis Directorate, U.S. Army Mobility Research and Development Laboratory, Fort Eustis, Virginia 23604.
CitationBorst, H., "Design and Analysis of Propellers for Low Reynolds Number Application to Mini-RPV's," SAE Technical Paper 770999, 1977, https://doi.org/10.4271/770999.
- Borst H.V., et al, “Summary of Propeller Design Procedures and Data, Vols. I, II and III,” USAAMRDL Technical Report 73-34C, H.V. Borst & Associates, Wayne, Pa., November 1973.
- Theodorsen T., “Theory of Propellers.” McGraw Hill, 1948.
- Abbott Ira H. & Von Doenhoff A. E., “Theory of Wing Sections.” Dover Publications, Inc.
- Lindeey W. F., Stevenson D. B. and Daley Bernard N., “Aerodynamic Characteristics of 24 NACA Series Airfoils at Mach Number Between 0.3 and 0.8.” NACA TN 1546.
- Delano James B. and Carmel Melvin M., “Tests of Two-blade Propellers in the Langley 8-Foot High-speed Tunnel to Determine the Effect on Propeller Performance of a Modification of Inboard Pitch Distribution.” NACA TN 2268, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, Langley Field, Va., February 1951, Washington.
- Pendley Robert E., “Effect of Propeller Axis Angle at Attack on Thrust Distribution Over the Propeller Disk in Relation to Wake-survey Measurement of Thrust.” ARR No. L5J02b, NACA, Washington, Wartime Report.
- Maynard J. D. and Steinberg S., “Effect of Blade Section Thickness Ratios on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Related Full-scale Propellers at Mach Nos. up to 0.65.” NACA Report 1126, 1953.
- Jacobs E.N. and Sherman A., “Airfoil Section Characteristics as Affected by Variations of the Reynolds Number.” NACA TR 586, 1937.
- Reif E. F., Jones R. and Bell A.H., “Tests of Six Airfoil Sections at Various Reynolds Numbers in the Compressed Air Tunnel.” Reports and Memoranda No. 1706, April 1936.
- Jones R. and Williams D.H., “The Effect of Surface Roughness on the Characteristics of the Airfoils NACA 0012 and RAF 34,” Reports and Memoranda 1708.
- Lnenicka Jareslay, “Unpublished Test of a NACA 4412 Airfoil at Reynolds Number 20,000 to 250,000.” Letter to L. K. Loftin of NASA, 19 March 1974.
- Althaus D., “Experimental Results From the Laminar Wind Tunnel of the Institut Für Aero and Gasdynamik Der University Stuttgart.” Stuttgarter Profilkatalog I, 1972.
- Schmitz F.W., “Aerodynamics of the Model Airplane, Part 1.” Transited by Translation Branch Redstone Scientific Information Center Research and Development, Directorate, U. S. Army Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, N70-39001.
- Deslauriers E.J., “Blade Performance at Low Reynolds Numbers.” General Electric, Report No. R54AGT605, dated 1-14-55.
- Lippisch A., “Unstetigkecten Im Verlsuf Des Profilwiderstandes.” Messerschmitt, A. G. Augsburg, March 1941.
- Lippisch A.M., “Wing Sections For Model Planes.” Air Trails Pictorial, April 1950.
- Reid E.G., “The Influence of Blade-width Distribution on Propeller Characteristics.” NACA TN No. 1834, March 1949.
- Reid E.G., “Wake Studies of Eight Model Propellers.” NACA TN No. 1040, July 1946.
- Reid E.G., “Studies of Blade Shank Form and Pitch Distribution for Constant-speed Propellers.” NACA TN No. 947, January 1945.
- Grose R.M. and Taylor H.D., “Wind Tunnel Studies of the Effects of Blade Thickness Ratio, Camber and Pitch Distribution on the Performance of Model High-speed Propellers.” Hamilton Standard Report No. HS-1352, June 1955.
- Grose R.M. and Brindley D.L., “A Wind Tunnel Investigation of the Effect of Blade Activity Factor on the Aerodynamic Performance of Model Propellers at Flight Mach Numbers From 0.3 to 0.9.” Hamilton Standard Report No. HS-1l25, March 1954.
- Clyde H. McLemore, “Wind-tunnel Tests of a 1/20-scale Airship Model With Stern Propellers.” NASA TN D-1026.
- Whitcomb Richard T. and Clark Larry R., “An Airfoil Shape for Efficient Flight at Supercritical Mach Numbers.” NASA TM X-1109, 1965.
- Whitcomb Richard T., “Review of NASA Supercritical Airfoils.” ICAS Paper No. 74-10, Presented at the Ninth Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Haifa, Israel, August 1974.
- Wortmann F.X., “A Critical Review of the Physical Aspects of Airfoil Design at Low Mach Numbers.” Institut Für Aerodynamik u. Gasdynamik, der Universitat Stuttgart, Published at the MIT Symposium “Technology and Science of Motorless Flight”, Boston 1972.
- Bocci A.J., “A New Series of Airfoil Sections Suitable for Aircraft Propellers.” Aeronautical Quarterly, February 1977.
- Hoerner S.F., “Fluid-dynamic Drag.” published by the Author, 1965.