This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison Between Child Cadavers and Child Dummy by Using Child Restraint Systems in Simulated Collisions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1976 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
At present, numerous restraint systems for children applied in vehicles are in general considered for the use on the back seats. Up to now, only impact tests with dummies and animals have been carried through by these systems. Out of the great number of children seats and belts we used a system (deformable safety impact table combined with a lap-belt) which has been investigated by us during frontal impacts utilizing two dummies and four cadavers of children in the age of 2,5 up to 11 years having body weights of 16 up to 31 kg. The tests have been conducted on the deceleration-sled track at the Institute of Legal Medicine of the University Heidelberg. Impact velocities of 30 km/h and 40 km/h at a medium deceleration of 20g have been chosen. None of the test subjects showed injuries to the inner organs; however, numerous muscular hemorrhages as well as hemorrhages of discs and ligaments were noticed. The HIC values lay between 100 and 500; accelerations in x-direction up to 44g and in z-direction up to 85g occurred at the head. Lap-belt forces of 160 up to 400daN were measured. A weak point of the investigated system is that the child's movements are considerably limited, a factor also noticed in other child restraint systems; however, the protective function proved to be an advantage. The movements during the impact, pictured by high-speed cameras, essentially differ from those of adults wearing 3-point belts. The maximum flexion of the vertebral column is, due to the system, located in the transition of the thoracic to the lumbar vertebral column and the flexion angles amounted about 90°. As expected were the maximum head displacements in relation to a sled-fixed axis dependent on the impact velocity and the body height, and ranged between 50 cm (crash velocity 30 km/h, body height 97 cm) and 90 cm (crash velocity 40 km/h, body height 139 cm). The movements will be analysed; the anatomical and mechanical causes are going to be investigated. Finally will the results be compared with similar dummy tests investigated by us. Due to these differences in the dummy and cadaver behavior the necessity is pointed out to examine all restraint systems by cadaver tests.
CitationKallieris, D., Barz, J., Schmidt, G., Heess, G. et al., "Comparison Between Child Cadavers and Child Dummy by Using Child Restraint Systems in Simulated Collisions," SAE Technical Paper 760815, 1976, https://doi.org/10.4271/760815.
- RobertsV.L. and McElhaneyJ.H., “Dynamic Performance of Child Seating Systems.” Paper 720971 Proceedings of the 16th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Detroit, Michigan, 1972.
- StalnakerR.L. and MelvinJ.W., “Evaluation of Current Production and Prototype Child Restraint Systems in the USA.” Proceedings of the International Meeting on Biomechanics of Trauma in Children, Lyon, France, 1974. Publ. by IRCOBI.
- Dye E.R., “Automobile Crash Protection for Children.” Passenger Car Design and Highway Safety, 1962.
- Aldman B., “A Protective Seat for Children” Proceedings of the 8th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Detroit, Wayne State University Press, 1966.
- AppoldtF.A., “Dynamic Tests of Restraints for Children.” Proceedings of the 8th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Detroit, Wayne State University Press, 1966.
- SiegelA.W., NahumA.M. and ApplebyM.R., “Injuries to Children in Automobile Collisions.” SAE Transactions Vol. 77, 1968.
- DIN 4849, “Kindersicherungseinrichtungen in Kraftfahrzeugen.”
- British Standard BS AU 157, “Children's restraining devices, April 1973.
- Revised Version of MVss 213, “Child restraint standard.” Draft, 1 March 1974.
- ECE Draft, June 73, Draft Regulation, “Restraining devices for child occupants.”
- HerbertD.C., VazeyB.A., WyllieJ.M., VaughanR.G. and LeitisV., “Evaluation of Australian Child Restraints.” Proceedings of the 17th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 1973.
- LowneR.L., “Injuries to Children involved in Road Accidents.” Proceedings of the International Meeting on Biomechanics of Trauma in Children. Lyon, France, 1974. Publ, by IRCOBI.
- SchreckR.M. and PatrickL.M., “Frontal Crash Evaluation Tests of a Five-Point Harness Child Restraint.” Proceedings of the 19th Stapp Car Crash Conference, San Diego, Cal., 1975.
- Kallieris D., “Eine Fallgewichtsbeschleunigungsanlage zur Simulation von Aufprallunfällen.” Prinzip und Arbeitsweise. Z. Rechtsmedizin 74, 25 (1974).
- SchmidtG., KallierisD., BarzJ., MatternR. and KlaiberJ., “Neck and Thorax Tolerance Levels of Belt-Protected Occupants in Head-On Collisions” Proceedings of the 19th Stapp Car Crash Conference San Diego, California, 1975.
- SchmidtG., KallierisD.,BarzJ. and MatternR., “Results of 49 Cadaver Tests Simulating frontal Collisions of Front Seat Passengers.” Proceedings of the 18th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Warrendale, Penns., 1974.
- WalkerL.B., HarrisE.H. and PontiusU.R., “Mass, Volume, Center of Mass and Mass Moment of Inertia of Head and Head and Neck of Human Body.” Proceedings of the 17th Stapp Car Crash Conference Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, 1973.
- KallierisD., MeisterB. and SchmidtG., “Reactions observed of the cervical spine during frontal crashes of belt protected cadavers.” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Biomechanics of Serious Trauma, Birmingham, 1975, Publ. by IRCOBI.