This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Evaluation of Two Convex Mirror Systems by Government Drivers
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
A nationwide field study of two types of convex mirror systems was made by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) with the cooperation of the General Services Administration (GSA) for a 10-month period starting in January 1974. One convex mirror system, called the Type I system, consisted of a non-adjustable convex mirror on the right fender, the original outside mirror on the driver's door, and a larger inside mirror. The Type II mirror system consisted of an adjustable convex mirror mounted on each fender and the original inside rearview mirror.
A total of 515 Federal employees evaluated these two convex mirror systems at six major test locations to provide 627 questionnaires. An analysis of the questionnaires shows that drivers preferred the Type II convex mirror system over the Type I. From comments received, it seems that the drivers objected mostly to the non-adjustable feature and restricted field of view of the Type I system rather than to the fact that it was only a one-convex mirror system as compared to a two-convex mirror system. However, neither convex mirror system was rated as highly as the periscope system was evaluated in a previous field test of 50 periscope equipped GSA automobiles (1)*. This suggests that drivers would prefer unit magnification mirror systems with larger rearward fields of view over convex mirror systems with roughly the same view; nevertheless, drivers also prefer the convex mirror systems tested over conventional mirror systems because the convex mirrors provide greater rearward visibility.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Kaehn, C., "Evaluation of Two Convex Mirror Systems by Government Drivers," SAE Technical Paper 750472, 1975, https://doi.org/10.4271/750472.Also In
References
- Kaehn Charles “Periscope Device Field Evaluation by Government Drivers,” SAE Paper No. 740963 International Automobile Engineering and Manufacturing Meeting Toronto, Canada October 21-25 1974
- Rowland George E. Silver Carl A. et. al. “A Comparison of Plane and Convex Rear View Mirrors for Passenger Automobiles,” NHTSA, U. S. Department of Transportation August 1970
- Notice of Proposed Rule Making “Indirect Visibility: Passenger Cars, Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles, Trucks, Buses, and Motorcycles,” Federal Register 36 16 January 23 1971 1156 1160
- Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 111 “Rearview Mirrors - Passenger Cars and Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles,” NHTSA, Federal Register 32 23 February 3 1967
- SAE Recommended Practice, J834 “Guides for Rear Vision in Passenger Cars,” June 1962
- Van Eyl Phillip “The Effect of Mirror Distortion on Acuity and Size Discrimination Tasks,” Report for Donnelly Mirrors, Inc. Holland Michigan November 1974
- Seesar James “Automotive Convex Mirrors-Optical Properties,” Technical Report 201 for Donnelly Mirrors, Inc. Holland Michigan February 1974
- Kelley C. R. Prosin D. J. “Motor Vehicle Rear Vision,” NHTSA, U. S. Department of Transportation August 1969
- Mortimer R. G. “The Effects of Convex Exterior Mirrors on Lane-Changing and Passing Performance of Drivers,” SAE Transactions 80 1971 paper 710543
- Mortimer R. G. Jorgeson C. M. “Drivers' Vision and Performance with Convex Exterior Rearview Mirrors,” SAE Paper No. 740961 , Automobile Engineering Meeting Toronto, Canada October 21-25 1974
- Walraven P. L. Michon J. A. “The Influence of Some Mirror Parameters on the Decisions of Drivers,” SAE Paper No. 690270 SAE Automotive Engineering Congress Detroit, Michigan January 1970
- Jani S. N. Menozes D. F. “A Comparison of Seeing Times Using Plane and Convex Mirrors,” Jrl. of Indiana State Medical Association March 1962 103 109
- Burger W. J. et. al. “Studies in Motor Vehicle Rear Vision: II. Evaluation of Innovations in Passenger Car and Truck Rear View Systems,” NHTSA, DOT November 1974