This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Three-Point Harness Accident and Laboratory Data Comparison
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1974 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
A combined program of accident investigation, staged collisions, and simulated collisions involving three-point harnessed occupants in frontal force collisions has provided a means of correlating injury with forces and/or other physical parameters associated with the injuries. With a strict screening to ensure complete data on each accident, 128 cases involving 169 occupants at barrier equivalent velocities from 2-53 mph were compared with the results from 11 staged collisions and 72 simulated collisions.
There were 14 rib cage injuries ranging from single sternum fracture to seven rib fractures at velocities of 10-53 mph at injury levels of AIS 2 and 3. A single AIS 4 injury was the most serious injury and consisted of a ruptured spleen. The most serious brain injury was an AIS 2. Two cervical vertebra fractures were found, one of which was a 12-year-old male and the other a 76-year-old female. Only 14 occupants had AIS 3 injuries.
No abdominal (except the ruptured spleen) organ injuries, thoracic organ injuries, breast injuries, clavicle fracture, or eye injuries were reported, and there were no AIS 5 or fatalities in the sample.
It is concluded that: the harness is highly efficient in mitigating injuries, rib and sternum fractures are the more prevalent injuries, submarining is not a major problem, females are injured at lower collision severity than males, and age is an important factor in injury susceptability.
The overall tolerance level for 50% injury at the AIS 3 level is 45 mph at an upper shoulder harness load of 1930 lb, a chest Gadd Severity Index of 560, and a peak resultant chest acceleration of 85 g.
|Technical Paper||Target Population for Injury Reduction from Pre-Crash Systems|
|Technical Paper||Traffic Related Disabilities and Impairments and Their Economic Consequences|
|Technical Paper||Intrusion in Side Impact Crashes|
CitationPatrick, L., Bohlin, N., and Anderson, A., "Three-Point Harness Accident and Laboratory Data Comparison," SAE Technical Paper 741181, 1974, https://doi.org/10.4271/741181.
- December 22 1970
- Bohlin Nils “A Statistical Analysis of 28,000 Accident Cases with Emphasis on Occupant Restraint Value.” Paper 670925 Eleventh Stapp Car Crash Conference New York Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. 1967
- Bohlin N. Norin H. Andersson A. “A Statistical Traffic Accident Analysis.” AB Volvo, Car Division Fourth International Experimental Safety Vehicle Conference Kyoto March 1973
- Nelson W. D. “Lap-Shoulder Restraint Effectiveness in the United States.” Paper 710077 SAE Automotive Engineering Congress Detroit January 1971
- Nelson W. D. “Restraint System Effectiveness.” Fifteenth Annual Conference, American Association of Automotive Medicine October 1971
- Grime G. “Accidents and Injuries to Car Occupants Wearing Safety Belts.” Automobile Engineer July 1968
- Carter R. L. “Passive Protection at 50 Miles Per Hour.” SAE Transactions 81 1972 paper 720445
- SAE Recommended Technical Practice, Collision Deformation Classification-SAE J224a, SAE Handbook
- Burdi A. R. Huelke D. F. “Infants and Children in the Adult World of Automobile Safety Design: Pediatric and Anatomical Considerations for Design of Child Restraints.” Jrl. Biomechanics 2 London Pergamon Press 1969 267 280
- Lundstrom L. C. “The Safety Factor in Automotive Design.” Paper 660539 SAE National West Coast Meeting Los Angeles August 1966