This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effects on Drivers´ Response Times and Errors of Some Malfunctions in Automobile Rear Lighting Systems
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Surveys of rear lighting system malfunctions on passenger cars and light trucks showed that about 4% of vehicles with single compartment rear lamps had an inoperative presence or stop/turn lamp, while less than 1% of vehicles with multiple compartment rear lamps had at least one operating presence lamp compartment working on each side, and about 2.5% had no stop/turn signal lamp compartments operating on one side. Thus, although the frequency of failure of bulbs or circuits was greater in rear lighting systems with multiple compartment than single compartment lamps, the likelihood that at least one presence or signal lamp compartment will be operating on each side of the vehicle is greater in lighting systems with multiple compartment lamps, by 2-3%.
The effects of some rear lighting system malfunctions on the ability of drivers to identify signals was evaluated in two experiments using a driving simulator. Six rear lighting systems using combined function, separate function, signal lamp redundancy, and color coding were compared in normal and malfunctioning operating conditions.
It was concluded that the use of signal lamp redundancy offers only a minor benefit in terms of driver performance. In other respects, those rear lighting systems employing separation of function provided better performance of drivers. One system using stop signal lamp redundancy and separation of function provided effective detection of stop signals. The most effective systems used color coding and functional separation of signal lamps. It was suggested that vehicles with multiple compartment signal lamps employ variable-load flashers. However, communication of braking and turning can best be accomplished by functional separation and color coding in vehicle rear signaling systems.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Mortimer, R. and Domas, P., "Effects on Drivers´ Response Times and Errors of Some Malfunctions in Automobile Rear Lighting Systems," SAE Technical Paper 741000, 1974, https://doi.org/10.4271/741000.Also In
References
- Mortimer R. G. “Research in Automotive Rear Lighting Systems.” General Motors Corp. 1969
- Mortimer R. G. “Dynamic Evaluation of Automobile Rear Lighting Configurations.” Highway Research Record 275 1969 12 22
- Mortimer R. G. “Automotive Rear Lighting and Signaling Research.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation Contract FH-11-6936 Highway Safety Res. Inst., Univ. of Michigan Report No. HuF-5 1970
- Mortimer R. G. “Psychological Research in Automobile Rear Lighting.” SAE Transactions 79 1970 paper 700388
- McCutcheon R. W. Sherman H. W. “The Influence of Periodic Motor Vehicle Inspection on Mechanical Condition.” Highway Safety Res. Inst., Univ. of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan July 1968
- Hrebec M. P. “State Compulsory Inspection Systems; Michigan System and Data Summary.” Conference on Inspection Testing of Automobiles: Its Prospects for Accident Reduction Washington Univ. St. Louis January 1968
- Reinfurt D. W. Pascarella E. A. “Periodic Motor Vehicle Inspection in North Carolina: A Descriptive Study.” Highway Safety Res. Center, Univ. of North Carolina Chapel Hill, North Carolina November 1969
- Zoltan N. “The Use of Turn Signals as Related to the Driver-Vehicle Roadway Complex.” MS Thesis Ohio State Univ. 1963
- Zuercher J. Haddock R. Miller T. Vopel C. “The Use of Turn Signals on the Expressway.” Traffic Safety Research Review 12 2 1968 56 59
- Campbell J. D. Mortimer R. G. “The HSRI Part-Task Driving Simulator for Research in Vehicle Rear Lighting and Related Studies.” Report No. UM-HSRI-HF-72-12 Highway Safety Res. Inst., Univ. of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan November 1972