Special Facilities Needs
Published February 1, 1972 by SAE International in United States
Annotation of this paper is available
Arguments are put forth that the current urban transportation planning process is failing to address itself to the causal factors and elements of the urban environment that creat the demand for travel. The approach to urban transportation analysis and development is argued to be best done through work on special facilities. Special facilities are defined as the basic building blocks of life in the urban environment. The reason for the study of special facilities needs is that the true determinants of travel behavior can be best established at this level. Using trip-aggregate models behavior specific to special facilities is suppressed. The success of disaggregate (individual-based) models in modeling modal choice behavior is extended to the analysis of special facilities. The need for policy-sensitive models further exemplifies special facilities models.
CitationPernela, L., "Special Facilities Needs," SAE Technical Paper 720569, 1972, https://doi.org/10.4271/720569.
- Fleet C. R. and Robertson S. R., “Trip Generation in the Transportation Planning Process.” Highway Research Record 240, 1968.
- deNeufville R. and Stafford J. H., “Systems Analysis for Engineers and Managers.” New York, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
- Lisco T. E., “The Value of Commuter's Travel Time: A Study in Urban Transportation.” Highway Research Record 245, 1968.
- Quarmby D. A., “Choice of Travel Mode for the Journey to Work: Some Study Findings.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 1, No. 3, September 1967.
- Warner S. L., “Stochastic Choice of Mode in Urban Travel: A Study in Binary Choice.” Evanston, Illinois: Transportation Center, Northwestern University, 1962.
- Thomas T. C., “Value of Time for Commuting Motorists.” Highway Research Record 245, 1968.
- McGillivray R. G., “Binary Choice of Transport Mode in the San Francisco Bay Area.” University of California, unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, 1969.