This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Mix of Demands
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1972 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
There are two general approaches to travel demand analysis currently being suggested: one the widely used “Urban Transportation Planning process,” and the other the use of “Direct Demand Models.” Their general forms, strengths, and weaknesses are sketched briefly here, and some problems common to both approaches are investigated. These include the limitations imposed by the single period, static, partial equilibrium nature of the analysis, and the problems raised by the possible existence of multiple equilibria within that framework.
The paper advocates research in several directions which would help to alleviate the problems in current procedures, and which also promises to yield some policy guidelines as research progresses. These are the investigation of peaking patterns and the forces behind them, the quantitative representation of more dimensions of traveler experience than are currently being analyzed, the analysis of different socio-economic stratifications, the inclusion of auto ownership decisions into the travel demand prediction process, and the development and comparison of alternative structural formulations for determining passenger demand. It is suggested that, for the time being, analyses along the proposed lines should be conducted in connection with specific, relatively small-scale transport projects as opposed to a modeling effort which attempts to tackle all of the analysis problems simultaneously.
CitationKulash, D., "The Mix of Demands," SAE Technical Paper 720568, 1972, https://doi.org/10.4271/720568.
- Quandt R. E. Baumol W. J. “The Demand for Abstract Transport Modes: Theory and Measurement,” Lexington, Mass. Heath Lexington 1970
- Systems Analysis and Research Corporation “Demand for Intercity Passenger Travel in the Washington-Boston Corridor,” 1963
- McLynn J.M. Watkins R.H. “Multimode Assignment Model,” Northeast Corridor Transportation Project Technical Paper No. 7 1967
- Wohl Martin “Notes on Transient Queuing Behavior, Capacity Restraint Functions, and Their Relationship to Travel Forecasting,” “Papers of the Regional Science Association,” XXI 1968
- Traffic Research Corporation “Empiric Land Use Forecasting Model, Calibration Report,” 1966
- Harris Britton “Experiments in Projection of Transportation and Land Use,” Traffic Quarterly XVI 2 1965
- Lowry Ira “A Model of Metropolis,” Santa Monica, Calif. RAND Corporation 1966
- Wohl Martin “A Methodology for Forecasting Peak and Off-Peak Travel Volumes,” Working Paper 450-21 The Urban Institute 1970
- Kraft Gerald Wohl Martin “New Directions for Passenger Demand Analysis and Forecasting,” Transportation Research I 1967
- Gustafson R. L. Curd H. N. Golob T. F. “User Preferences for a Demand Responsive Transportation System: A Case Study Report,” paper Highway Research Board 1971
- Paine F. T. et al. “Consumer Attitudes Toward Auto Versus Public Transport Alternatives,” Journal of Applied Psychology LIII 6 1969
- Wachs Martin “Employment, Mobility, and Public Transportation in Chicago: A Survey of Attitudes and Behavior,” Highway Research Record No. 348 1971
- U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1963 Census of Transportation I “Passenger Transportation Survey,” 1963
- Kamit E. L. “Selected Statistics by Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas for Use in Transportation Planning,” unpublished tables 1964
- Domencich T. A. Kraft Gerald “Free Transit,” Lexington, Mass. Heath Lexington 1970
- McGillivray R. G. “Demand and Choice Models of Modal Split,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy IV 2 1970
- Manheim M. L. “Practical Implications of Some Fundamental Properties of Travel Demand Models,” Highway Research Board 1972
- Manheim M. L. “Principles of Transport Systems Analysis,” Highway Research Record No. 180 1967