This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Development of the Crash Sensor/Vehicle Interface
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1972 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Crash sensor interfacing with the automobile must be approached from the occupant protection standpoint. Generation of the crash pulse, which determines occupant response, is affected by complex vehicle variables that often preclude discrimination from noncrash signals. Synthesis of the design solution is approached on a systems basis to match sensor capability to vehicle variables. Reliability is provided for with appropriate design of experiments and statistical analysis.
CitationTermaat, K. and Freeman, K., "Development of the Crash Sensor/Vehicle Interface," SAE Technical Paper 720425, 1972, https://doi.org/10.4271/720425.
- Allen C. H. Bruce R. D. Dietrich C. W. Pearsons K. S. “Noise and Inflatable Restraint Systems.” Final report to Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc. Report No. 2020 April 30 1971
- Provancher R. W. “Effect of Sensor Closure Time on Unrestrained Occupant Response.” Unpublished Ford Motor Co. report March 15 1972
- Freeman K. A. Lacaze L. “Remote Mounted Crash Detectors.” Unpublished Ford Motor Co. report Oct. 27 1971
- Henson S. E. “Dynamic Response of the Air Bag Sensor.” Unpublished Ford Motor Co. report Sept. 9 1969
- Wagner R. C. et al. “Compilation of Hazard Analysis and Fault Tree Analysis.” Unpublished Ford Motor Co. report Feb. 19 1971
- Hammer W. “Designing a Safe System.” Machine Design 42 Sept. 3 1970 91 97
- Honeywell, Inc. “A Practical Guide to Ordinance Systems Design Safety.” Minnesota: Hopkins, Private Contractor 1970
- Larsen W. F. “Fault Tree Analysis.” Final report to Picatinny Arsenal Pamphlet No. ARDIP No. 20 August 1968