This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Results of Interlaboratory X-Ray Stress Measurements
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The data from five residual stress round robins run by the X-Ray Fatigue Division of the SAE Fatigue Design and Evaluation Committee have been studied. Many factors affecting precision have been isolated during 16 years of testing. Some of these relate to the sample?material hardness and geometry- while others, such as alignment, are instrumental or procedural. Laboratories using proper techniques can achieve an interlaboratory standard deviation of 2.5 ksi on a stressed, hardened steel cylinder.
Authors
Citation
Evans, W., Ricklefs, R., Hanson, R., and Larson, J., "Results of Interlaboratory X-Ray Stress Measurements," SAE Technical Paper 720244, 1972, https://doi.org/10.4271/720244.Also In
References
- Martin D. E. “Evaluation of Methods for Measurement of Residual Stress.” SAE Information Report HS-147 1957
- Christenson A. L. et al “The Measurement of Stress by X-Ray.” SAE Information Report HS-182 1960
- Christenson A. L. Rowland E. S. “X-Ray Measurement of Residual Stress in Hardened High Carbon Steel.” ASTM Transactions 45 1963 638 676
- Cohen J. B. et al “Increasing the Versatility of the GE Diffractometer.” Advances in X-Ray Analysis 7 1963 281 301
- Hilley M. E. et al “Residual Stress Measurements by X-Ray Diffraction.” SAE Information Report 1971 38
- Youden W. J. “Graphical Diagnosis of Interlaboratory Test Results.” Industrial Quality Control May 1959 24