This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Why the Issue Is Loss Reduction Rather than Only Crash Prevention
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published February 01, 1970 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
There is no reason why highway loss reduction countermeasure priorities must parallel the rank of causes. Traditional emphasis only on crash prevention ignores major opportunities for reducing losses to damaged people and property. A standard method is needed for rating vehicles' occupant protection considering limits set by physics and body force tolerances. The use of structural damage for crash energy absorption, particularly at 5 to 20 m.p.h., is archaic in comparison with aircraft strut design. It is predicted that the present, structural-damage approach to low speed energy absorption will soon become publicly unacceptable.
CitationHaddon, W., "Why the Issue Is Loss Reduction Rather than Only Crash Prevention," SAE Technical Paper 700196, 1970, https://doi.org/10.4271/700196.
- Baker, C.D., Deputy Under Secretary of Transportation, Testimony on H.R. 8190, a bill “To amend the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 to authorize appropriations for the fiscal years 1970, 1971 and 1972” before the Subcommittee on Commerce and Finance of the House Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee, March 17, 1969.
- Deuteronomy 22:8, Revised Standard Version, 1952.
- 1968 Alcohol and Highway Safety Report, A Study Transmitted by the Secretary of the Department of Transportation to the Congress, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1968, pp. 86-87.
- Haddon, W., Jr., The Changing Approach to the Epidemiology, Prevention, and Amelioration of Trauma: the Transition to Approaches Etiologically Rather than Descriptively Based. American Journal of Public Health, 58, 1431-1438, 1968.
- Department of Transportation, National Highway Safety Bureau, Highway Safety Program Standards, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, February 1969.
- Damon, A., Stoudt, H.W., McFarland, R.A., The Human Body in Equipment Design, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1966.
- Morrill, T.C., Testimony on behalf of the State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company before the Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly, December 10, 1969.
- Insurance Information Institute, New York, December 1969.
- Haddon, W., Jr., Testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monoply, October 6, 1969.